posted
Great to see these cars back in service. Are there more than two of these out now? I heard one was going to the CZ and one to the Chief.
But, but, but.... The text in the page you linked to says: David Gunn vowed to have consistent paint jobs on its equipment. Unlike the locomotive, which is Phase V with the blue wave, it would cost more to develop a Phase V format for the Superliners, so they resorted to keeping the pin stripes to keep all Superliners identical.
By eliminating the blue "Superliner" lettering and adding the lower red stripe they won't quite match the others. If consistency is the goal, they should stick with Phase IVa. But I nitpick.
------------------ Trust God, love your neighbor, and never mistake opinion for truth. -Mr. Toy
posted
I'm just glad that Gunn isn't going to worry about ANOTHER brand new Phase VI paint scheme. So it's nice to have Phase IVb on the Superliners, whereas it doesn't stand out too different from the unrefurbished cars.
And hip-hip horray on Gunn dismantling the Acela brandname! Very thankful that the Superliners weren't renamed to Aceliner...
Posts: 82 | From: Irvine, CA | Registered: Feb 2002
| IP: Logged |
posted
Interesting that Gunn wants identical paint schemes on the superliners...but we see something different enough that even "Joe Six-pack" would notice. Or would he?
The paint in nice, I'd even say a bit more classy than the IVa.
As a whole, it blends well with other equipment, like the baggage cars, but to the "trained eye", it makes for a mis-matched superliner set if they repaint half the fleet and then decide on something else.
Nevertheless, equipment has been repaired, and it wouldn't matter if it was pink, well maybe not pink, but still...
posted
hey call me stupid but what does "transition sleeper" actually mean?
Posts: 416 | From: St. Albans, Vermont | Registered: Feb 2003
| IP: Logged |
posted
A transition sleeper is where the crew can move between the baggage car and the superliners. It is also where the onboard crew sleep
Posts: 27 | From: Cleveland | Registered: Jan 2003
| IP: Logged |
posted
The transition sleepers have a lower door on one end which is even in height to that of baggage and Amfleet cars. The other end is the same height to the rest of the Superliner consist. The crew can then move freely throughout the train. There are bedrooms similar to that of sleeping cars for the crews, and on the lower level is a lounge with tables and chairs, and the conductor's "office", as Chris's site shows.
As far as the paint job goes, I think it's a nice and welcome change. The omission of the word "Superliner" gives the cars a "cleaner" exterior, and gives the entire consist a more modern and classy look.
Posts: 553 | From: Flagstaff, AZ USA | Registered: Apr 2001
| IP: Logged |
posted
I actually liked having the word "Superliner" on the cars. I will miss that.......
Posts: 2428 | From: Grayling, MI | Registered: Mar 2002
| IP: Logged |
I'll miss Superliner. And to be honest, I don't like this new scheme at all. The red stripe reminds me of pajamas or a clown or something. And I don't like the type of car being omitted after the number. I sure hope this stays on only a few cars, its too much bare metal, bring back the large Superliner lettering please!
[This message has been edited by Southwest Chief (edited 03-07-2003).]
Posts: 579 | From: San Bernardino Subdivison | Registered: Dec 2001
| IP: Logged |
posted
Well, since we're posting opinions about something we can do nothing to alter, which is always fun, I'll chime in.
I like the new scheme and a agree that it is much cleaner and modern looking than the older versions. As for too much "bare metal", IMO, nothing looked finer in rain or shine than the Q's Zephyrs which were about as simply adorned as possible.
posted
According to the compilation of wrecked Superliners appearoing in Rail Travel News Issue #651, 39044 was wrecked in the Texas Eagle Hallsville, TX incident during Sept 2001.
"Every litter bitt" helps.
Posts: 9975 | From: Clarendon Hills, IL USA (BNSF Chicago Sub MP 18.71) | Registered: Apr 2002
| IP: Logged |
Printer-friendly view of this topic
