Looks like Bush' croneys on Amtraks board are going head to head with Gunn. I find it interesting that David Gunn did not send the main report to congress this year instead it was David Laney who like everyone else left on the board was appointed by Bush (this includes Mineta too). Reading the two reports it seems Laney is more willing to go along with Bush's proposals then Gunn. Why else would there by two seperate reports submitted by Amtrak if there wasnt a disagreement between Gunn and the Board?
Also how come they did not submit a Budget request for 2006? Gunn has been very clear the number is somewhere between 1.6-1.8 billion. Why are they just now studying the numbers unless they are going to submit a NEC budget only? A NEC budget that will have a low ball number making LD routes look bad?
If anyone can take on this fight its Gunn, but it makes things 1000X more difficult if Amtraks board doesnt want to run a national system. I hope I'm reading more into this then there is.
Posts: 5 | From: san diego | Registered: Feb 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
I'm reading the letter a little differently. He's saying Bush's budget of zero, is not necessarily a bad thing as an attention getter, but he also says it is the wrong approach to reform.
Laney says that adequate funding is essential, and that strategic planning coordinated between DOT, Amtrak, the freight railroads and other interested parties is essential. That's something I have been saying for some time now.
He goes on to say that the threat of bankruptcy might make a good incentive to get their house in order, but he notes that the effect of bankruptcy would ultimately be counterproductive to the cause of reform.
The letter also praises David Gunn for his efforts, and its importance in getting Amtrak's house in order.
So I don't see any conflict between David Gunn and the board in this letter.
As for why they don't have a budget request yet, the five year "state of good repair" plan has to be adjusted after the recent passage of the '05 request, which was less than needed to continue with this year's portion program. I suspect the request for '06 may actually ask for an increase over what was originally planned to compensate for this year's shorfall.
Posts: 2649 | From: California's Monterey Peninsula | Registered: Dec 2000
| IP: Logged |
Those of you in Virginia, the Carolinas, Georgia, Florida or wherever, come visit with us for a few hours Tuesday at the Charlotte Amtrak Station. (11:00am would be a good time) Bring your signs and comfortable walking shoes.
First time I've felt like an activist in 20 years!
Thanks, David
-------------------- David Pressley
Advocating for passenger trains since 1973!
Climbing toward 5,000 posts like the Southwest Chief ascending Raton Pass. Cautiously, not nearly as fast as in the old days, and hoping to avoid premature reroutes. Posts: 4203 | From: Western North Carolina | Registered: Feb 2004
| IP: Logged |
Printer-friendly view of this topic
