RailForum.com
TrainWeb.com

RAILforum Post New Topic  Post A Reply
my profile | directory login | register | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» RAILforum » Passenger Trains » Amtrak » Metrolink engineer was texting just seconds before Chatsworth crash

   
Author Topic: Metrolink engineer was texting just seconds before Chatsworth crash
smitty195
Full Member
Member # 5102

Member Rated:
5
Icon 1 posted      Profile for smitty195     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I saw this over on another website, and I'm posting it here. Absolutely incredible.
__________
National Transportation Safety Board
Washington, DC 20594
October 1, 2008

************************************************************

UPDATE: NTSB'S INVESTIGATION OF THE METROLINK, UNION PACIFIC
ACCIDENT IN CALIFORNIA

************************************************************

The following is an update of the NTSB's investigation of
the September 12, 2008 accident in Chatsworth, California
involving a Metrolink commuter train and a Union Pacific
freight train. As a result of the head-on collision, there
were 25 fatalities and numerous injuries.


Information regarding the Metrolink engineer's cell phone
activity on the day of the accident was obtained from his
service provider under subpoena from the NTSB. As part of
the ongoing investigation, this information is being used to
determine the timing of cell phone activity, which includes
text messaging to and from the engineer's cell number, in
relation to the engineer's duty hours and train operations.

Although the precise timing and correlation of these events
is still underway at the Safety Board's Recorder Laboratory,
preliminary information is being released regarding the
approximate cell phone activity during the engineer's duty
hours on the day of the accident.


On the day of the accident, the Metrolink engineer was on
duty for two periods of time. The engineer was responsible
for the operation of a train from 6:44 am until 8:53 am.
During this period of time, the engineer's cell phone
received 21 text messages and sent 24 text messages.


He was then off duty until 2:00 pm. The engineer was
responsible for the operation of Metrolink train 111 from
3:03 pm until the time of the accident. During this time
period, the engineer's cell phone received 7 text messages
and sent 5 text messages. According to the time on the cell
phone provider's records, the last text message received by
the engineer's phone before the accident was at 4:21:03 pm,
and the last text message sent from the engineer's cell
phone was 4:22:01 pm.


A preliminary estimate for the time of the accident,
according to the Union Pacific train's onboard recorders, is
4:22:23 pm. The Safety Board's Recorder Laboratory is
continuing to correlate times recorded for use of the
Metrolink engineer's cell phone, train recorder data, and
signal system data to a common time base.


"I am pleased with the progress of this major investigation
to date," Acting NTSB Chairman Mark V. Rosenker said today.
"We are continuing to pursue many avenues of inquiry to
find what caused this accident and what can be done to
prevent such a tragedy in the future."


-30-

NTSB Media Contact:

Terry N. Williams
(202) 314-6100
williat@ntsb.gov

Posts: 2355 | From: Pleasanton, CA | Registered: Apr 2007  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Gilbert B Norman
Full Member
Member # 1541

Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Gilbert B Norman     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
As I noted at the other Metrolink topic, young people can't seem to get along without it:
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/29/technology/29drill.html

However, "it's all over the media"; I just heard MSNBC's "bottom of the hour news summary" during Chris Matthews's show and the story was mentioned, although hardly in the detail that Mr. Smith's material provides.

But quite simply, I remain at a loss to understand why even the NTSB insists on "feeding the media" with piecemeal facts regarding the incident. It's just not the way the Board has worked in the past. No wonder young people like JONATHON persist with discussion of the matter (oh and JONATHON; if I'm not sticking up for you, at least I empathize with your recent posting I admittedly criticized).

Finally, in the interest of continuity, could we continue our discussion of this incident over at the original topic thread?

Posts: 9976 | From: Clarendon Hills, IL USA (BNSF Chicago Sub MP 18.71) | Registered: Apr 2002  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Geoff Mayo
Full Member
Member # 153

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Geoff Mayo   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Gilbert B Norman:
Finally, in the interest of continuity, could we continue our discussion of this incident over at the original topic thread?

I would agree with you, but the other thread has gone so far off-topic that it's a 51:49 choice for me whether to continue here or there.

Presumably since this came from the NTSB we can now regard it as fact that the engineer was indeed texting within minutes of the accident. His earlier trip appeared to have consisted of receiving or sending a text message every 3 minutes.

Regarding the NTSB releasing this, it's not unusual for investigatory bodies releasing interim reports. The more severe the accident, the more interim reports appear. Indeed, the NTSB have themselves released 11 interim (update) reports on various transport incidents this calendar year.

The original of Smitty's source can be found at http://www.ntsb.gov/pressrel/2008/081001.html

Geoff M.

--------------------
Geoff M.

Posts: 2426 | From: Apple Valley, CA | Registered: Sep 2000  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
JONATHON
Full Member
Member # 2899

Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for JONATHON   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Thank You

--------------------
JONATHON D. ORTIZ

My MySpace

CoastStarlight@Gmail.com

Amtrak Pages WebSite

Posts: 989 | From: DIAMOND BAR CA. U.S. | Registered: Nov 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
The Chief
Full Member
Member # 2172

Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for The Chief     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Smitty, this is why we have this news item:
Federal railroad regulators have issued an emergency order prohibiting the use of personal electronic devices by rail workers operating trains and performing other key jobs.

The Federal Railroad Administration issued the order Thursday. It says violators will be subject to civil penalties and removed from "safety-sensitive" jobs.
Link to story

--------------------
_ _ __ _ _ ŤĦę ĊĦĪĘҒ
_|_|_|_|_|

Posts: 190 | From: Fort Worth, Texas | Registered: Dec 2002  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
   

Quick Reply
Message:

HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.

Instant Graemlins
   


Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


Contact Us | Home Page

Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.2




Copyright © 2007-2016 TrainWeb, Inc. Top of Page|TrainWeb|About Us|Advertise With Us|Contact Us