posted
What ever happen for plans to bring back the Daylight Route? I remember that they was looking at what equipment to use, the time from LA to San Francisco and the CTC issues. Has anyone heard anything about this Train? Also how many trains could they run bewteen LA & SFO if they did have all in place?
Posts: 40 | From: Tarzana, CA-USA | Registered: Sep 2000
| IP: Logged |
The Daylight did LAUPT-SJ in 8 h 38 m The Daylight did LAUPT-SF in 9 h 45 m The Daylight Oakland cars did LAUPT-Jack London Square in 9h 57 min For that matter, The Lark did LAUPT-SJ in 9 h 55 min all in the dark.
Amtrak does LAUPT-SJ in 10 h 27 m.
John
quote:Originally posted by GP25: What ever happen for plans to bring back the Daylight Route? ...snip...
------------------ The City of Saint Louis (UP, 1967) is still my standard for passenger operations
posted
Actually, Mr. Pullman, I have heard "talk" over the years regarding a 4th St.- LA "Daylight". But I'm sure it was just that - talk!
Also, lest we forget, there was a second Amtrak train over the route (without positively checking dates) the "Spirit of California" ran an overnight schedule SAC-LAX 1983-1986.
The "Spirit" was 403(b) funded and obviously the proposed "Daylight" would have been as well. "Spirit" died when the funding went elsewhere.
From having a memorable trip on the Lark, circa 1963, the thought of having an "engineers side" roomette, with a "raising of the shade" long about Point Conception on a crystal clear morning, followed by breakfast in Lark Club while passing through Oxnard and Santa Barbara, and concluding going over the Santa Susanah Pass at Chatsworth, I would have hoped that the Spirit could have "hung on". However, replicating all of the above in an Amfleet-I dinette would not quite be the same.
I always thought that there was a "thing or two that should have been tried" before throwing in the Spirit's towel. One was assignment of Superliner equipment and second was extending the route San Diego-Sparks. The "turn" at Sparks would have been tight, but doable, However, this was pre-1996 when the SP had a "performance clause" as part of their operating agreement with Amtrak, and with such, the trains were always "more or less" on time.
However, considering there was State money on the table, I think the "powers that be" (legislature, Transportation Dept??) did the right thing; and that was putting frequent trains where the people are and integrating well coordinated bus connections elsewhere through the State.
Posts: 9976 | From: Clarendon Hills, IL USA (BNSF Chicago Sub MP 18.71) | Registered: Apr 2002
| IP: Logged |
posted
Yes I was talking about the Los Angeles-San Francisco Run. The Daylight Route Via San Luis Obispo and Salinas. And thanks for the information. But I would like to know. How many runs could be running from LA to SFO during the day?
Posts: 40 | From: Tarzana, CA-USA | Registered: Sep 2000
| IP: Logged |
Since we're bragging on train trips of long ago, in 1963 my mom, my brother and I took a section on the City of Saint Louis from LA to Abilene, KS to visit my grandparents. Let's just say I was a year away from joining the Cub Scouts then and leave it at that... since I think you have a couple of mornings on me
Sadly, I know nothing of the Spirit of California. I was a young Captain of Artillery at the moment, stationed in the V Corps sector of Germany. Now, ask me about DB and SBB...
I honestly think you are right. Watching my old home state from a distance, California seems to need interurban operations more than anything else. SF/Oakland down to Castroville or so... SF/Oakland to Sacramento Santa Barbara to San Diego and all around whatever anyone cares to call that sprawl that once was a beautiful city named Nuestra Ciudad de la Reina de Los Angeles.
GP25:
Once upon a time, there were perhaps as many as five LA-SF movements per day ... just before World War II ... Morning Daylight Noon Daylight Lark Coaster Coast Mail (aka LA-SF Passenger)
What I've found interesting over the years is that (***SHOCKING***) 1st Class, Scheduled, MAIL AND EXPRESS TRAIN... with a rider coach!!
Funny ... haven't we talked about that elsewhere on these boards????
As a kid, camping at Refugio in Santa Barbara County in the 60s and 70s, I remember 10-12 movements a day of freight in addition to the Daylight and the Lark (yes, I'm a reformed car-counter).
So the capacity of the system is there, especially on the line haul between Santa Barbara and Castroville or San Jose (depending on how far the commute operations run now).
What isn't there is time. Even in 1958, it was a full days' run between LA and SF. Good old PSA (remember how old I was in 63?) proved the puddle jump could be done in under 90 minutes. Even with the post-911 security delays, it is still at worst a half-day effort to fly LA-SF.
Mr Toy lives somewhere in the high rent district of Monterey County. His input to this thread would be quite useful.
John
------------------ The City of Saint Louis (UP, 1967) is still my standard for passenger operations
[This message has been edited by PullmanCo (edited 08-31-2002).]
quote:Mr. Toy lives somewhere in the high rent district of Monterey County. His input to this thread would be quite useful.
And here I am! But we don't pay high rent. We've got a (relatively) low mortgage!
Yes the revival of the Coast Daylight is still in the works. Plans called for it to start up in October 2001, but the state's energy crisis that year blew the state budget, delaying start-up until 2003 at the earliest.
Plans call for the train to run once a day in each direction, 2-3 hours before the Starlight. But that may change. They expect to use Surfliner equipment, or if that is not available in time, Horizon cars.
There is documentation available from this site http://www.slocog.org/reports/reports.html At the top right of that page is a link under "Studies" for the "Coast Daylight Implementation Plan" in PDF format.
Incidentally, there was a program on KQED (The SF PBS station) called California Connected. In one segment a self-proclaimed hater of California was assigned to travel from LA to San Francisco by train. He got to Union Station and was given two options: The Coast starlight (12 hours) or a bus to Bakersfield to catch a San Joaquin to Emeryville (9 hours). He opted for the latter. He said the bus and train were comfortable, and fairly priced, but he thought it was ridiculous that there was no direct train connection between the state's two largest cities, like you find in the Northeast.
He concluded by saying "This state has been talking about high-speed trains as long as PBS has been running the Lawrence Welk Show!"
------------------ Trust God, love your neighbor, and never mistake opinion for truth. -Mr. Toy
posted
Low mortgage??? Toy, I'd hate to see your definition of Low Mortgage. My folks sold our three bedroom (2200 sq ft) house, with pool and orange grove (a whole 8 trees) in the San Fernando Valley in 1980 for 160K!
Move up houses here in flyover country got to that level a couple of years ago. Prices in your neck of the woods are somewhere between outrageous and unreachable.
Oh, well. KQED. That brings back my more favorite station from The City ... KFOG!
BTW, didn't Oakland outstrip The City in population years ago, as a single municipal element within in the Contra Costa - East Bay - Peninsula metropolitan statistical area?
Have a great Sunday, John
quote:Originally posted by Mr. Toy: And here I am! But we don't pay high rent. We've got a (relatively) low mortgage!
...snip...
He got to Union Station and was given two options: The Coast starlight (12 hours) or a bus to Bakersfield to catch a San Joaquin to Emeryville (9 hours). He opted for the latter.
------------------ The City of Saint Louis (UP, 1967) is still my standard for passenger operations
posted
Mr Toy, I read much of the 48 pages of the document you provided with great interest.
There were a few dogging questions that it introduced, but I will only address one.
If the Daylight would only preceed the Starlight by about two hours or less, would it not make sense for Amtrak to adjust the Starlight for an evening departure from LA? Granted, the Daylight would stop at more cities.
posted
You think they should use the Superliner Sightseer Lounge Car or Dining Car? If Amtrak has enough that is not wrecked.
Posts: 40 | From: Tarzana, CA-USA | Registered: Sep 2000
| IP: Logged |
posted
One possible reason for not shifting the Starlight to an evening departure: it would mean another night on the train, with a morning arrival into Seattle. Another night means more laundry.
Also, I don't know what the statistics are, but isn't California more populated around the route than Oregon is, hence it would be better to serve California during the daytime?
Geoff M.
Posts: 2426 | From: Apple Valley, CA | Registered: Sep 2000
| IP: Logged |
Who is the target audience, beyond overflow from the Startlight and passengers on the Peninsula who don't want to be inconvenienced with a train change in San Jose?
Second Question:
ELEVEN HOURS? How in the &&&& did the Coast Line slow down by an hour and a half?
The Lark, working overnight, ran slower, malice aforethought. Arrive in LA or SF in time for the business day.
The Daylight, under Espee, ran 9 hours 45 minutes from 3d and Townsend to LAUPT.
It does not make sense to slow down.
Third Question: WHY MARKET THE MOST BEAUTIFUL TRAIN IN THE WORLD as a bloody commuter package? I rode SP3600 class domes on the Starlight. MARKET THE TRIP for Pete's sake.
There's a reason Espee, in it's heyday, had a triple unit diner-lounge and a parlor/observation car on the consist.
I know you weren't involved in the study. It just seems to me some consultant needs to be thrown off the Gaviota trestle.
Disgusted, John
------------------ The City of Saint Louis (UP, 1967) is still my standard for passenger operations
[This message has been edited by PullmanCo (edited 09-01-2002).]
If the Daylight would only preceed the Starlight by about two hours or less, would it not make sense for Amtrak to adjust the Starlight for an evening departure from LA? Granted, the Daylight would stop at more cities.
Well, I'm no expert on scheduling, but the Starlight has to consider timing along its entire route, not just between LA and Oakland. But I should add that the Daylight schedule is not set in stone. It may very well change before it gets up and running. I haven't read the report lately, but I believe they expect there will eventually be sufficient demand for multiple daily departures of the Daylight, allowing for trips both before and after the Starlight.
------------------ Trust God, love your neighbor, and never mistake opinion for truth. -Mr. Toy
Who is the target audience, beyond overflow from the Startlight and passengers on the Peninsula who don't want to be inconvenienced with a train change in San Jose?
Isn't that enough if they can fill the train? Also, the Daylight will stop at more cities than the Starlight, including Gilroy, Pajaro, King City, and several other cities down south.
quote:Second Question:
ELEVEN HOURS? How in the &&&& did the Coast Line slow down by an hour and a half?
Two words, Union Pacific. The Starlight takes almost 12 hours, too. The official goal is to get it down to 8 hours, eventually.
quote:Third Question: WHY MARKET THE MOST BEAUTIFUL TRAIN IN THE WORLD as a bloody commuter package? I rode SP3600 class domes on the Starlight. MARKET THE TRIP for Pete's sake.
I don't know, I just live here.
And to respond to your earlier post, four years ago we got out of the renters rut and bought a small house for $145,000. Then prices took off like mad. Today we could sell it for more than twice that. Our mortgage is atleast $300 less than most people here pay for a two bedroom apartment. Our income is modest, but we can easily afford to live here now.
------------------ Trust God, love your neighbor, and never mistake opinion for truth. -Mr. Toy
posted
That's not as bad as I had thought it would be.
Of course, LA & SF are the places people quoute for real estate prices in the Golden State.
John
quote:Originally posted by Mr. Toy: I don't know, I just live here.
And to respond to your earlier post, four years ago we got out of the renters rut and bought a small house for $145,000. Then prices took off like mad. Today we could sell it for more than twice that. Our mortgage is atleast $300 less than most people here pay for a two bedroom apartment. Our income is modest, but we can easily afford to live here now.
------------------ The City of Saint Louis (UP, 1967) is still my standard for passenger operations
quote:Originally posted by PullmanCo: That's not as bad as I had thought it would be.
Of course, LA & SF are the places people quoute for real estate prices in the Golden State.
Well, for us its not bad, but those who keep track of such things say that overall Monterey County has the highest housing costs in California right now.
posted
I would like to know. Which would be great on these SFO-LA run in terms of a cafe car? The Surfliner Coach/Cafe Car or the Superliner Sightseer/Lounge Car(33000 series)? I would like to see the Sightseer Car since they are good for the longer distance runs. And all the windows they have. I know how many people would be siting in these cars along the trip right? I also think the Sightseer Cars have a little more space for the storing of the food for the run it makes. But which cafe car should be used on this route?
Baggage 3 x 9900 series AT&SF Bi-level Coach. 2 x AT&SF or BN full-length domes (I would reconfigure the lower lounges and dorm space as cafe style food service. 1 x twin-unit diner 2-3 x AT&SF or BN full length domes, configured as parlor cars.
I MIGHT EVEN blow off the diner and use the lower space in each dome as food service ... UP did a lot in the 30s with very little space, and if you set a single card menu, you can get somewhere...
Remember, this is wishful thinking.
More realistically, I'd see ....
1-2 Superliner Coach, reconfigured to single seating for 1st class parlor space.
1 Sightseer Lounge ... reconfigured downstairs for quality foodservice
2-3 Superliner Coaches ... one reconfigured downstairs as a foodservice operation.
John
------------------ The City of Saint Louis (UP, 1967) is still my standard for passenger operations
posted
Well. Which route will likely happen first? The Daylight or the LA-Vegas Train. Or even the LA-Palm Springs Train I have heard rumors about. I wonder which will start first.
Posts: 40 | From: Tarzana, CA-USA | Registered: Sep 2000
| IP: Logged |
posted
Under current Amtrak conditions, wouldn't any new train start be a long way off (unless of course it was heavily subidized by the state which is probably not likely either due to the budget crisis)? New equipment would probably have to be purchased because Amtrak hardly has enough Superliners for all it's long distance trains. Of course, they could use Amfleet equipment (one set is held in reserve in L.A. for the Surfliners) and even add a full length Great Dome. They still occasionally use one on the Surfliner.
Posts: 246 | From: Anaheim, CA | Registered: Apr 2002
| IP: Logged |
posted
PullmanCo, I'm checking in as a Native Son & lifelong resident of CA. I agree...."I'll bet on none" I don't believe I'm being pessimistic, it's just with all I've seen & not seen here in the Golden State & with Amtrak, I think I'm being realistic. Actually, I hope I'm wrong. Just my opinion.
[This message has been edited by CK (edited 09-07-2002).]
posted
Pullman, regarding your dream Heritage consist: In the 1970s the Starlight had a "snack car" in the middle of the coaches. This was a counter-service diner, with a full kitchen, that served hamburgers and other light meals. I always liked that car. Perhaps you might add that to your list?
As for the fiscal situation for the Daylight revival, the state budget is pretty tight right now. However, there is a proposition on the November ballot which would devote a percentage of the sales tax from automobile sales to transportation. From this rail would get something over $700 million a year, broken down as follows (according to RailPAC)
$36 million for Intercity Rail (construction and operations)
$36 million for rail rehabilitation, security, and improvements
$36 million for rail grade separations
$146 million for transit operations, including light and commuter rail
$155 million for transit capital, including light and commuter rail
$146 million for traffic congestion relief projects, including many rail projects
$27 million for transit oriented development projects, mainly at rail stations.
I don't know what its chances are, but there is hope.
------------------ Trust God, love your neighbor, and never mistake opinion for truth. -Mr. Toy
It's my fantasy consist ... you get to set up your own fantasy consist
As far as the forthcoming election goes ... I come from the Prop 13 era ... when "a money issue is on the ballot ... let's vote it down."
I'm also a product of (egad!) the Los Angeles Unified School District (1974 vintage) ... I can remember a steady string, since 1966 or so, of bond issues for the schools going to defeat at the polls.
What I'm saying Mr Toy? Simple: Vote yes but do not hold your breath.
John
------------------ The City of Saint Louis (UP, 1967) is still my standard for passenger operations
posted
The full length lunch counter cars referred to by Messrs Pullman and Toy, were ex-ATSF, and found their way on to the "Pioneer Days" Starlight consists when they were largely all ex-ATSF "steam ejector" cars (this was one positive thing that the oft-reviled FSK did while VP-Ops at Amtrak, and that was to "standardize" the consists to the extent possible with the "pre-Heritage hand me downs" i.e. "steam ejector cars assigned to the Starlight)
Elsewhere, I believe I recall a Grand Canyon ride with those cars in consist.
The UP also had cars similiarly configured. During 1962 aboard their Sea-Portland "pool" train, I recall one, along with, as an aside, some of the "Train of Tomorrow" cars.
Posts: 9976 | From: Clarendon Hills, IL USA (BNSF Chicago Sub MP 18.71) | Registered: Apr 2002
| IP: Logged |
Speaking of GM's project, I keep hearing rumors that at least one of the "Train of Tomorrow" domes survived Uncle Peter's sales to scrappers.
What have you heard?
Thanks, John
quote:Originally posted by Gilbert B Norman: ...snip...
The UP also had cars similiarly configured. During 1962 aboard their Sea-Portland "pool" train, I recall one, along with, as an aside, some of the "Train of Tomorrow" cars.
------------------ The City of Saint Louis (UP, 1967) is still my standard for passenger operations
posted
Gilbert, I'm not sure what "steam ejector" cars are. But it looks like I rode them.
Since we've gone off on this tangent, One thing I vividly remember about the early Starlight were two types of coaches. One type had a blue and white color scheme with a single large restroom at each end (one men's one ladies) and the hallway wrapped around it (which also reduced vestibule noise in the seating area)
The other coaches were predominantly pale green and white. They had two restrooms at each end, with the hallway split down the middle (These toilets were smaller, but still quite spacious compared to Superliner toilets). The rest room doors were red, I think. On the walls in these cars at each end in the seating area were large round gold colored medallions with a southwestern Indian design on them. I have often wondered if they originally came from the Santa Fe Chief. Anyone know?
------------------ Trust God, love your neighbor, and never mistake opinion for truth. -Mr. Toy
posted
I am not sure they were "Train of Tomorrow" engine and cars, but there is a GM project train at the museum in St. Louis. Could have been a '50's era turbo train. Cars looked like they were built by GM coach division.
Posts: 8 | From: San Diego, CA USA | Registered: May 2002
| IP: Logged |
posted
Steam ejector is the method of cooling the freon on the air conditioner for the next pass.
By the time I attended UCSB, Amtrak ran mainly ex SP articulated Daylight coaches and ex ATSF 44 & 48 passenger coaches on the Daylight/Starlight. I think that's what you rode
John
quote:Originally posted by Mr. Toy: Gilbert, I'm not sure what "steam ejector" cars are. But it looks like I rode them.
Since we've gone off on this tangent, One thing I vividly remember about the early Starlight were two types of coaches. One type had a blue and white color scheme with a single large restroom at each end (one men's one ladies) and the hallway wrapped around it (which also reduced vestibule noise in the seating area)
The other coaches were predominantly pale green and white. They had two restrooms at each end, with the hallway split down the middle (These toilets were smaller, but still quite spacious compared to Superliner toilets). The rest room doors were red, I think. On the walls in these cars at each end in the seating area were large round gold colored medallions with a southwestern Indian design on them. I have often wondered if they originally came from the Santa Fe Chief. Anyone know?
------------------ The City of Saint Louis (UP, 1967) is still my standard for passenger operations
posted
Well. Does anyone think when this line goes get going. Should Amtrak have the Cars in the old Daylight Colours? BTW. Thanks for all the replys. Keep them coming.
Posts: 40 | From: Tarzana, CA-USA | Registered: Sep 2000
| IP: Logged |
posted
If you're paying for the paint job, then yes, Daylight colors. May I have your ABA bank number and account number? I'm sure Mr Gunn would love your offer to underwrite painting the consists!
Otherwise, as long as the carbody skin and frame are uncompromised, I don't care if it's unwashed Pullman green, bright stainless, or Pennsy locomotive Brunswick green (aka BLACK!).
Disgusted, John
------------------ The City of Saint Louis (UP, 1967) is still my standard for passenger operations
posted
IF anything were to happen, and I think right now it's a big IF, the cars will probably be painted in some version of the Amtrak California scheme, which is either the kind used by the Surfliners or the one used by the Capitols and San Joaquins. OR if they use Superliners (which is not going to happen under current conditions) they'd probably be in the Phase IV pinstripe scheme.
Posts: 246 | From: Anaheim, CA | Registered: Apr 2002
| IP: Logged |
posted
It'll either be Surfliners or Horizon cars given what's available right now. All this conjecture about any other possible paint schemes is just that, conjecture (read foamer pipe dreams). We'll know in a couple of months as the proposed start up is this January, with the new CEO's blessing of course.
Posts: 249 | From: Downey CA USA | Registered: Jul 2000
| IP: Logged |
posted
Well Cajon. We will just have to see Which route starts up. It would be sad but funny if the LA-Vegas and the Daylight both did start up then. But we will have to just wait and see what happens.
Posts: 40 | From: Tarzana, CA-USA | Registered: Sep 2000
| IP: Logged |
posted
It is my understanding they plan to use Surfliners on the Daylight to allow for interchangability with those other routes down south. I think they plan to use Surfliners on the Las Vegas train, too. Standardized equipment across the region would allow easy shifting of cars to meet demand.
------------------ Trust God, love your neighbor, and never mistake opinion for truth. -Mr. Toy
posted
Well. do you like we have see a mix of Surfliners, Superliners and even some Cal Cars? That are in Service and not going for Paint. It would be good to see if they did send for Paint. But also have them in Service too. Thats if they use the Surfliners on this and or the LA-Vegas Trains.
Posts: 40 | From: Tarzana, CA-USA | Registered: Sep 2000
| IP: Logged |