RailForum.com
TrainWeb.com

RAILforum Post New Topic  Post A Reply
my profile | directory login | register | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» RAILforum » Passenger Trains » Amtrak » VIA Montreal-Gaspé Service Suspended

   
Author Topic: VIA Montreal-Gaspé Service Suspended
David
Full Member
Member # 3

Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for David     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
It's been over a year since the train formerly known as the Chaleur ran beyond New Carlisle to Gaspé, but recently the portion between Matapedia and New Carlisle was also suspended. VIA provided a bus service to and from Matapedia, keeping to the times of the former train. With no hope that the infrastructure will be repaired any time soon VIA, not surprisingly, has suspended service indefinitely after 17th Sept.

http://www.viarail.ca/en/about-via-rail/media-room/latest-news/66251/22-august-2013-via-rail-service-between-matapedia-new-ca

Orléans Express runs a bus service from Matapedia and Campbellton to Gaspé and return. This makes a connection, albeit not a convenient one, with the VIA trains. For the foreseeable future, VIA is running the Chaleur consist between Montreal and Matapedia. I can see the need for that during the peak season when the Ocean is often sold out, but when the passenger loads drop off after Thanksgiving I wouldn't be surprised to see trains 16 & 17 discontinued.

Posts: 216 | From: Mississauga, Ontario, Canada | Registered: Jul 2000  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
notelvis
Full Member
Member # 3071

Member Rated:
5
Icon 1 posted      Profile for notelvis     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
'Suspended' can be an ambiguous term.....

Are the Vancouver Island RDC's and the Sunset Limited east of New Orleans not also 'suspended'.

This may well be the end of the Gaspe' train regardless of what they call it.

--------------------
David Pressley

Advocating for passenger trains since 1973!

Climbing toward 5,000 posts like the Southwest Chief ascending Raton Pass. Cautiously, not nearly as fast as in the old days, and hoping to avoid premature reroutes.

Posts: 4203 | From: Western North Carolina | Registered: Feb 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Jerome Nicholson
Full Member
Member # 3116

Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Jerome Nicholson     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Yeah. This winter they'll drop the other shoe.
Posts: 510 | From: Richmond VA USA | Registered: Mar 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Gilbert B Norman
Full Member
Member # 1541

Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Gilbert B Norman     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
A 'Q' to our Canadian members informed of VIA affairs.

What regulatory oversight, if any, is there of VIA's routes and services? In short, can VIA unilaterally discontinue service, or is there a process of public hearings and other protocols that must be adhered to?

For ready reference, Amtrak, under ARAA 97, is required to give 180 Day Notice of intent to discontinue service over any route (not frequencies). There is a process of public hearings and review by the Surface Transportation Board with the request either being affirmed or denied.

However, it should be noted that Amtrak has never been denied authority to discontinue a route, and in one instance, Sunset East, it appears that Amtrak has been successful in discontinuing that route even though Notice was never served.

Posts: 9976 | From: Clarendon Hills, IL USA (BNSF Chicago Sub MP 18.71) | Registered: Apr 2002  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
David
Full Member
Member # 3

Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for David     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Gilbert B Norman:
A 'Q' to our Canadian members informed of VIA affairs.

What regulatory oversight, if any, is there of VIA's routes and services? In short, can VIA unilaterally discontinue service, or is there a process of public hearings and other protocols that must be adhered to? ...


The regulations have been eliminated. VIA can do anything it wishes subject, of course, to political pressure. The last time VIA had to apply to discontinue a train was well before the 1990 chop by the Conservative government of Brian Mulroney. VIA wanted to discontinue the lightly-patronised overnight Toronto-Ottawa train (which actually ran with the Montreal train for most of its route.)I can't remember the year, but the Transport Commission ruled in favour of VIA. By the time of the 1990 cuts, according to press reports, the government simply told VIA what to do with its budget being cut in half. The recent cut to VIA services appears not to have been as political. The government reduced the budget but appears to have let VIA decide what services to cut. VIA has to give 90 days notice - not because of any regulation, but to honour union contracts.
Posts: 216 | From: Mississauga, Ontario, Canada | Registered: Jul 2000  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
   

Quick Reply
Message:

HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.

Instant Graemlins
   


Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


Contact Us | Home Page

Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.2




Copyright © 2007-2016 TrainWeb, Inc. Top of Page|TrainWeb|About Us|Advertise With Us|Contact Us