RailForum.com
TrainWeb.com

RAILforum Post New Topic  Post A Reply
my profile | directory login | register | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» RAILforum » Passenger Trains » Amtrak » Palour Car Status?

   
Author Topic: Palour Car Status?
CoastStarlight99
Full Member
Member # 2734

Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for CoastStarlight99   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Hi All!

Haven't been on here in YEARS! Wow.

I just wanted to check if anyone had any update on the Parlour Cars and if they were in fact still running on 14/11 right now?

I know they were due for service this year I heard, and I also heard a Business Class was added to the Starlight this Summer.

I'm really hoping the Starlight service maintains at least what it's been in the last few years and does not further deteriorate. It's never been the same then it use to be but still my favorite route for sure.

Thanks!

Anton
www.PacificParlourCar.com

Posts: 1082 | From: Los Angeles, CA. USA | Registered: Aug 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
yukon11
Full Member
Member # 2997

Member Rated:
5
Icon 1 posted      Profile for yukon11     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Glad to have you back, CS99.

I keep hearing rumors that the PPC may be deleted. Hope not. They no longer have free cheese and crackers. The wine was around $9/glass, but I don't know what it costs, now.
I guess you still can get dinner in the PPC.

I probably shouldn't comment on the parlor car as it changes, often, and I don't know the latest news.

Regarding Business Class on the Starlight, check out Mr. Mayo's post, "Filling the Gaps".

Richard

Posts: 1909 | From: Santa Rosa | Registered: Jan 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
TwinStarRocket
Full Member
Member # 2142

Member Rated:
5
Icon 1 posted      Profile for TwinStarRocket     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I just saw an empty PPC hitched up to the eastbound Empire Builder here in Minnesota last week. Hopefully this means they are still rotating them through maintenance at Beech Grove after the peak travel season.
Posts: 1572 | From: St. Paul, MN | Registered: Dec 2002  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Gilbert B Norman
Full Member
Member # 1541

Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Gilbert B Norman     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Jerry, the Parlours maintenance base is LA, and I would think that if one were to be moved East for a heavy at BEE, it would have done so on #4, Chief. That car somehow just may be on its way for "disposition".

Sooner or later, Amtrak will recognize the folly of maintaining "five of a kind 60 year olds" that are nothing more than an amenity enhancement and are vulnerable to the "Micascope". I give them all a short lease on life.

Posts: 9975 | From: Clarendon Hills, IL USA (BNSF Chicago Sub MP 18.71) | Registered: Apr 2002  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
PullmanCo
Full Member
Member # 1138

Icon 1 posted      Profile for PullmanCo     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
The ATSF Hi-Level Lounges [Smile]

Wonderful equipment.

In 1971, they were 16 years old. Prime of life.

As GBN stated, they are 60 now. 1700 miles every week for 60 years? That's like 5 million miles on them.

They are not young anymore, structurally, and they are almost the very last of their breed (all Budd-built cars) in daily service.

Sadly, I'm with GBN, their days are numbered.

Posts: 1404 | Registered: Oct 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Geoff Mayo
Full Member
Member # 153

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Geoff Mayo   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
The trucks (wheelsets) probably are not 60 years old though. I'd be more concerned over their survivability in an accident given the massive advances in car design worldwide since then. At 80t they're not exactly light either (compare with a Superliner at 66t), which increases fuel cost and track wear and tear.

There's nostalgia and then there's practicality. Amtrak is a business, not a museum.

--------------------
Geoff M.

Posts: 2426 | From: Apple Valley, CA | Registered: Sep 2000  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
palmland
Full Member
Member # 4344

Member Rated:
5
Icon 1 posted      Profile for palmland     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
It seems to me that Amtrak could replace the PPC's with something almost as good but requiring a lot less maintenance expense.

Between the CONO and Capitol Ltd. there are probably 5 Superliner lounge cars in service. The CONO food service was just dumbed down and has a CCC for meals. I think the train could do just fine without a lounge if the lounge section of the CCC car was staffed. If you want a first class experience on the route, Travel Pullman.

The Capitol has better scenery, but if another of the CCC cars was in service (I believe Amtrak has surplus) one would serve cafe type meals and serve as coach lounge. The other would offer full service dining with lounge space for sleeping car passengers.

I think that would free up 5 lounge cars that could be easily upgraded to replace the PPC. Take out the cheap plastic seats and replace with those nice upholstered swivel chairs in use now. Some of the tables could remain for meal service.

Have the food catered and be on the level of first class airline meals. Use the lower level for prep and storage of meals. If necessary meals could be restocked at Emeryville but I believe some transpacific flights are almost as long as the CS trip. A small area between the seats and tables could be used for a small bar where the attendant would serve drinks, wine, and hors d'oeuvres.

Posts: 2397 | From: Camden, SC | Registered: Mar 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
PullmanCo
Full Member
Member # 1138

Icon 1 posted      Profile for PullmanCo     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I just flew Seattle-Incheon, and Incheon to Detroit.

12 hours in the air.

Somehow, if memory serves, Bay Area-Seattle is more than 12 hours, Bay Area to LA is right at 12 hours.

--------------------
The City of Saint Louis (UP, 1967) is still my standard for passenger operations

Posts: 1404 | Registered: Oct 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Gilbert B Norman
Full Member
Member # 1541

Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Gilbert B Norman     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Mr. Palmland, I think you have outlined a reasonable plan to continue a First Class service over what could be the route with the most diverse scenery on the System (I rode it during '62 - Daylights all the way).

However, one must wonder to what extent Amtrak's interests are enhanced by expending funds for a Premium service (away, of course, from Acela). Lest we forget, the Micascope.

Posts: 9975 | From: Clarendon Hills, IL USA (BNSF Chicago Sub MP 18.71) | Registered: Apr 2002  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
   

Quick Reply
Message:

HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.

Instant Graemlins
   


Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


Contact Us | Home Page

Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.2




Copyright © 2007-2016 TrainWeb, Inc. Top of Page|TrainWeb|About Us|Advertise With Us|Contact Us