RailForum.com
TrainWeb.com

RAILforum Post A Reply
my profile | directory login | register | search | faq | forum home

» RAILforum » Passenger Trains » Amtrak » Article about Amtrak's Future » Post A Reply

Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon: Icon 1     Icon 2     Icon 3     Icon 4     Icon 5     Icon 6     Icon 7    
Icon 8     Icon 9     Icon 10     Icon 11     Icon 12     Icon 13     Icon 14    
Message:

HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.

 

Instant Graemlins Instant UBB Code™
Smile   Frown   Embarrassed   Big Grin   Wink   Razz  
Cool   Roll Eyes   Mad   Eek!   Confused    
Insert URL Hyperlink - UBB Code™   Insert Email Address - UBB Code™
Bold - UBB Code™   Italics - UBB Code™
Quote - UBB Code™   Code Tag - UBB Code™
List Start - UBB Code™   List Item - UBB Code™
List End - UBB Code™   Image - UBB Code™

What is UBB Code™?
Options


Disable Graemlins in this post.


 


T O P I C     R E V I E W
Eric
Member # 674
 - posted
http://www.railnews.net/cgi-bin/news/golink.exe?http://www.buffalonews.com/editorial/20020331/1029690.asp
 
Mr. Toy
Member # 311
 - posted
Not a bad piece. They got a few of their figures wrong, but they gave one of the most accurate assessments of the political situation that I have seen in a long time.

------------------
Trust God, love your neighbor, and never mistake opinion for truth.
-Mr. Toy

The Del Monte Club Car
 

Ken V
Member # 1466
 - posted
Excellent article! One can only hope the optimistic picture Mr. Belden paints comes somewhere close to being a reality.

The acknowlegement that Amtrak is desperately in need of capital funding is right on. In my opinion, the first priority for capital spending should be in fixing existing equipment - both rolling stock still on the road and those cars sitting at Beech Grove. Additional equipment is also needed (but not more P42's or Amboxes)

Another important point that must be remembered is in this quote from the article

Till, in an interview, said one thing the reform council did not recommend was emulating the way Britain sold its rail infrastructure to private operators. There, system reliability has plummeted, fares on many lines have soared, and Railtrack, the company created to maintain tracks and stations, went bankrupt in October. Government officials estimate that it may take $100 billion to make the system reliable again.

------------------
Stop! Look! Listen! Remember...Where there are tracks, expect a train, at any time, in any direction.
Ken V.
 

Eric
Member # 674
 - posted
Listening Mr. McCain?
 
mrlithian
Member # 1129
 - posted
McCain is way busy planning that new airport in Arizona ... Besides, don't confuse him with the facts.
 
Mr. Toy
Member # 311
 - posted
quote:
Originally posted by Ken V:
Another important point that must be remembered is in this quote from the article
Till, in an interview, said one thing the reform council did not recommend was emulating the way Britain sold its rail infrastructure to private operators. There, system reliability has plummeted, fares on many lines have soared....,


Hmmmm. Of course, most of the rail infrastructure in this country is already in the hands of private operators, and since Amtrak was formed on-time reliability (which is in the hands of those operators) has plummeted.

------------------
Trust God, love your neighbor, and never mistake opinion for truth.
-Mr. Toy

The Del Monte Club Car

[This message has been edited by Mr. Toy (edited 04-03-2002).]
 




Contact Us | Home Page

Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.2




Copyright © 2007-2016 TrainWeb, Inc. Top of Page|TrainWeb|About Us|Advertise With Us|Contact Us