This IS an interesting thought. However, it DOES eliminate the possibility of a train that follows a time-schedule that is different.One of the main reasons that the Skyline appeals to me is that it's schedule offers a NIGHT train east from Pittsburgh to Philadelphia , which does not exist at the present time. Also, the schedule WEST from Pittsburgh would be different also. It is nice to have a different choice of trains available over the same route. But, I guess hundreds of people have the same wish as mine.
In Pennsylvania , there is a HUGE difference between Amtrak service WEST and EAST of Harrisburg. As many of you may know, the track EAST from Harrisburg is designated as a CORRIDOR , and all electrified. At LEAST 15 trains a day leave Harrisburg Eastward to Philly and NYC , and arrive in Harrisburg from those cities (the Keystone service.)
In comparison, TWO trains leave Pittsburgh to Harrisburg , and two head westward from there.
In my opinion, there is simply no excuse for this. Sate legislators certainly are aware that the Western part of the state is not served NEARLY as well as the Eastern part.
When states offer Amtrak funds for service within, there should be a stipulation that the SERVICE be "equalized."
Amtrak service in Pennsylvania is GREAT---but only if you live in Harrisburg, Philadelphia or points in between.
If I recall, the track between Harrisburg and Pittsburgh has now been designated as a FUTURE corridor. But I most certainly will NOT be "holding my breath." I think the entire national corridor initiative is nothing but a big "joke." Why it would take BILLIONS and BILLIONS of dollars to develop and maintain , and YEARS of time to do so. Also, I hear NO talk of freight opposition to the whole idea and we know how powerful THAT lobby is.
To be honest, I think Amtrak's "death-warrant" was "signed, sealed, and delivered" when Congress stipulated that Amtrak needs to be self-sufficient financially by 2003.
posted