RailForum.com
TrainWeb.com

RAILforum Post A Reply
my profile | directory login | register | search | faq | forum home

» RAILforum » Passenger Trains » Amtrak » Amtrak plans fall return to Louisville KY. » Post A Reply

Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon: Icon 1     Icon 2     Icon 3     Icon 4     Icon 5     Icon 6     Icon 7    
Icon 8     Icon 9     Icon 10     Icon 11     Icon 12     Icon 13     Icon 14    
Message:

HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.

 

Instant Graemlins Instant UBB Code™
Smile   Frown   Embarrassed   Big Grin   Wink   Razz  
Cool   Roll Eyes   Mad   Eek!   Confused    
Insert URL Hyperlink - UBB Code™   Insert Email Address - UBB Code™
Bold - UBB Code™   Italics - UBB Code™
Quote - UBB Code™   Code Tag - UBB Code™
List Start - UBB Code™   List Item - UBB Code™
List End - UBB Code™   Image - UBB Code™

What is UBB Code™?
Options


Disable Graemlins in this post.


 


T O P I C     R E V I E W
Trainsandmore
Member # 896
 - posted
Guys I have Found This on the Article
on the Trainsmag.com.

Amtrak will return to Louisville,KY., in October, when the Kentucky Cardinal's run is extended across the Ohio river from its current terminus at Jeffersonville, Ind. The Last Amtrak train to call on Louisville was the Floridian, which ended its run in October 1979.

Work will begin next month on a $530,000 renovation of Louisville's Union Station, along with track improvements that will allow the Kentucky Cardinal to stop at at the Historic Stucture. the Evansville Courier & Press reported. the city has earmarked $300.000 for the project, while Amtrak will kick in $200.000. The Great American Station Foundation is Contributing $30.000 to the city's bus service, which will link with trains at the station.

Amtrak has been eyeing extending the Kentucky Cardinal's Chicago-Jeffersonville run to Nashville, Tenn. No decision is expected on that move until the end of the year, Amtrak spokesman Kevin Johnson told the newspaper.

so what do you Guys think.

 

Eric
Member # 674
 - posted
Anything that brings in more ridership is worth it!!!
It's important for the cities to help get the trains there, so it's good that they are willing to help pay for it!

Eric
 

jebradley
Member # 606
 - posted
All Amtrak decisions SHOULD be determined by: IF THE MARKET DEMAND IS THERE!

IF Amtrak has studied and so determined, the extension is welcome, but - IF THE MARKET DEMAND IS THERE, train should be further extended to Nashville, Chattanooga, ATLANTA, and ultimately to Macon and Florida. This is the second biggest gap in the current Amtrak system, after Pittsburgh-Columbus-Indianapolis-St. Louis (OR SOME VARIANT(S) DEPENDING ON MARKET DEMAND. Someone suggested Memphis-Birmingham-Atlanta which could be a lower-cost alternative or addition, too. But we don't need another loser like the Lake Country Express - which should have been a Chicago-Twin Cities train via Janesville and Madison, by the way; if so it would probably be continued. As it is, it just generated bad publicity for Amtrak and for the passenger train cause.
Jim Bradley Natl. Director Hawk Mtn. Chapter NRHS
 

DC2001
Member # 542
 - posted
>>train should be further extended to Nashville, Chattanooga, ATLANTA, and ultimately to Macon and Florida. This is the second biggest gap in the current Amtrak system, after Pittsburgh-Columbus-Indianapolis-St. Louis<<

I've always tended to think of Chicago - Nashville - Atlanta - Florida as being the biggest hole in the Amtrak system, but I suspect it has something to do with the fact I live along that (missing) train route...

Anyway, it's hard to see how the market for a Chicago-Lousville train could be better than the market for a Chicago-Nashville (or Chattanooga, or Atlanta) train. Perhaps "by the end of the year" Amtrak will present a timetable for the Nashville extension, but even then the train faces challenges. For one thing, it would be a dead-end train route, with no connections below Indianapolis. If you are not going to/from the Nashville area, you won't be riding - a finite (though significant) number of potential passengers.

I'm afraid to hold my breath on this extension, since we are still waiting for the Silver Meteor to reach Boston (announced for summer 2000), service to Maine, the Sunset restructuring, and others.


 

skinsfan31
Member # 910
 - posted
I have in front of me an admittedly older route map (Fall 99), but it shows some glaring gaps in the coverage.

Yes, I agree that the most egregious gap in service is the Louisville-Florida corridor (served by the old autotrain Company before Amtrak, and I believe a train called the Floridian after 1970). But what about these gaps:

1. Maine. Yes, we've all heard that the "Downeaster" is supposed to start soon, but how soon?

2. Wyoming, Idaho, Oregon. Old Pioneer territory. If Amtrak can make the Southwest Chief successful, its hard to imagine that the Pioneer, or a version of that, would be too great a strain. It might even convince some that Amtrak was here to stay.

3. West Texas. An extension of the Crescent Star (which is yet to be definitely announced), into West Texas, connecting with the Chief somewhere like Lamy or Albuquerque.

There are other smaller things that seem obvious, such as running the train into Norfolk/Virginia Beach (one of the largest resort areas in the country), reviving the Atlantic City Express, returning the Sunset to Phoenix (and how about returning through service to Miami), extending Silver Service trains to Boston, and running daily trains (Sunset and Cardinal in particular). This is a lot to do right away, but this should start being worked on. Especially in the West, where airport and airplane troubles have been multiplying daily. It seems that Amtrak is doing everything in the NEC, but that's the only place that doesn't need work right now.

Oh, yeah, and they should adopt some kind of uniform look to their cars. There are six different paint schemes that I've counted floating around, plus separate California schemes. If they're going with Acela, make everything Acela. This is worse than the Rainbow Fleet.


 




Contact Us | Home Page

Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.2




Copyright © 2007-2016 TrainWeb, Inc. Top of Page|TrainWeb|About Us|Advertise With Us|Contact Us