RailForum.com
TrainWeb.com

RAILforum Post A Reply
my profile | directory login | register | search | faq | forum home

» RAILforum » Passenger Trains » Amtrak » SLO Saturday Morning (Bye-Bye SSW #9708) » Post A Reply

Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon: Icon 1     Icon 2     Icon 3     Icon 4     Icon 5     Icon 6     Icon 7    
Icon 8     Icon 9     Icon 10     Icon 11     Icon 12     Icon 13     Icon 14    
Message:

HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.

 

Instant Graemlins Instant UBB Code™
Smile   Frown   Embarrassed   Big Grin   Wink   Razz  
Cool   Roll Eyes   Mad   Eek!   Confused    
Insert URL Hyperlink - UBB Code™   Insert Email Address - UBB Code™
Bold - UBB Code™   Italics - UBB Code™
Quote - UBB Code™   Code Tag - UBB Code™
List Start - UBB Code™   List Item - UBB Code™
List End - UBB Code™   Image - UBB Code™

What is UBB Code™?
Options


Disable Graemlins in this post.


 


T O P I C     R E V I E W
fubu05
Member # 465
 - posted
Today, as I walked from the Shelter (Orcutt Rd.) to Downtown SLO
(City Hall), I chose to use a different route than usual. I used the
SLO Railroad Bikepath that runs alongside the wsternmost boundary of
Sinsheimer Park. I saw the answer to Dan Ainsworth's question "What
is the Power for this empty stack train?". The astounding answer,
there was no power attached to the train. As I got to the eastern
confluence of the Jennifer St. Bridge (that crosses the tracks south
of the station area). I noticed as I looked north, that SSW
#9708 "has Departed the Building" and the helper set is once again
back to the usual "All-Yellow" School Bus Consist. (Three Union
Pacific Locomotives). The units were spotted at the northern
confluence of the yard tracks and the San Simeon Block in SLO, which
was too far to see from the vantage point that I had. Whence
decending from the Bridge, the operator of Ambus #6234 (SLO Section
of trains #534/734 at San Jose) honked at me as I was passing in
front of the Union Pacific Police Substation Bldg. SSW 9708 did a
fine job while she was out here. We will miss her in San Luis Obispo.

Peter in SLO

------------------
Peter Van Warnerski
 

cajon
Member # 40
 - posted
Yawn
 
KA6BGJ
Member # 662
 - posted
Cajon, If the post was that boring to you, why did you bother to respond?
 
cajon
Member # 40
 - posted
It's not just boring but just plain junk. He did same post 2xs on this board, 2xs on trainboard & once on Altamont Press. Deleted from latter board already. He's supposedly got his own web site. Why casn't he just direct us there instead of wasting space EVERYWHERE!!!!
 
reggierail
Member # 26
 - posted
It would be nice to be civil on the board.
I do not see any relevance to Amtrak in the original post & we should keep to the topic.
Reggie

------------------

 

KA6BGJ
Member # 662
 - posted
Yes ReggieRail, I have to agree with you. I was wrong in submitting that reply to Cajun's response. I think that we should keep to the topic as much as possible. I really do not think that bickering and nit picking have a place on this board.

Let's all keep this Board interesting for the Readers by keeping focused on the Topic at hand when writing a post. Enuf said now.
 




Contact Us | Home Page

Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.2




Copyright © 2007-2016 TrainWeb, Inc. Top of Page|TrainWeb|About Us|Advertise With Us|Contact Us