RailForum.com
TrainWeb.com

RAILforum Post A Reply
my profile | directory login | register | search | faq | forum home

» RAILforum » Passenger Trains » Amtrak » E-mail from Senator Boxer » Post A Reply

Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon: Icon 1     Icon 2     Icon 3     Icon 4     Icon 5     Icon 6     Icon 7    
Icon 8     Icon 9     Icon 10     Icon 11     Icon 12     Icon 13     Icon 14    
Message:

HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.

 

Instant Graemlins Instant UBB Code™
Smile   Frown   Embarrassed   Big Grin   Wink   Razz  
Cool   Roll Eyes   Mad   Eek!   Confused    
Insert URL Hyperlink - UBB Code™   Insert Email Address - UBB Code™
Bold - UBB Code™   Italics - UBB Code™
Quote - UBB Code™   Code Tag - UBB Code™
List Start - UBB Code™   List Item - UBB Code™
List End - UBB Code™   Image - UBB Code™

What is UBB Code™?
Options


Disable Graemlins in this post.


 


T O P I C     R E V I E W
Mr. Toy
Member # 311
 - posted
I got this in my e-mail today in response to a "save Amtrak" e-mail I sent to Senator Barbara Boxer last week. She refers to bill S738, which is actually the Armed Forces Voting Rights Protection Act of 2001. I suspect she (or rather, a staffer) gave the wrong number. Does anyone know what she is referring to?

February 27, 2002

toylandmry@aol.com
Electronic Mail,

Dear Friend:

Thank you for your e-mail concerning Federal funding for Amtrak. I appreciate hearing from you on this important issue.

I supported legislation that would mandate a reorganization of Amtrak's management and labor practices. After a hard-fought compromise on a number of issues, the House and Senate decided
to allocate the additional $2.3 billion Amtrak needs to stay out of bankruptcy. The bill, S. 738, also authorizes a total of $5.1 billion for the railroad through fiscal year 2002.

I supported this legislation because I believe that it is essential for Congress to maintain a strong national passenger rail
system.

Again, thank you for writing to me on this matter, and please stay in touch with me.

------------------
Trust God, love your neighbor, and never mistake opinion for truth.
-Mr. Toy

The Del Monte Club Car
 

lakeshorelimited
Member # 576
 - posted
Atleast you've gotten a response! All I've received have been canned auto-responses, and nothing acknowledging the snail mail letters i sent in..
 
Mr. Toy
Member # 311
 - posted
I, too, get canned responses from Dianne Feinstein. My sister gets individual e-mail replies from her senator in Oregon (Smith?).

I sent Boxer a snail-mail letter last fall, just before the anthrax scare, and she finally responded to that yesterday by USPS. It said there had been a severe delay in replies because of the anthrax. That might still be affecting the replies to your mail, too.

------------------
Trust God, love your neighbor, and never mistake opinion for truth.
-Mr. Toy

The Del Monte Club Car
 

gadaniels
Member # 334
 - posted
I think its S1958, available at http://thomas.loc.gov (just enter bill number S1958 (title: Rail Passenger Service Improvement Act (Introduced in the Senate))
 
sideout1961
Member # 1297
 - posted
I just read s1958 and saw nothing in there about long distance rail service. I saw NEC mentioned though. So will we have long distance rail service after October or not? I really wish they would put these same requirements on the airline industry then see how long they would last before they went under. They seem to forget that there are alot of people who don't like to fly and the train is the only other option(outside of the bus,but I know I wouldn't want to go coast to coast on a bus). I wrote my congressmen and have got no response. I live in the northeast so I'm sure that answers that.
Sideout

[This message has been edited by sideout1961 (edited 03-01-2002).]

[This message has been edited by sideout1961 (edited 03-01-2002).]
 




Contact Us | Home Page

Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.2




Copyright © 2007-2016 TrainWeb, Inc. Top of Page|TrainWeb|About Us|Advertise With Us|Contact Us