RailForum.com
TrainWeb.com

RAILforum Post A Reply
my profile | directory login | register | search | faq | forum home

» RAILforum » Passenger Trains » Amtrak » Washington Post article on Washington–Baltimore Maglev (proposed) » Post A Reply

Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon: Icon 1     Icon 2     Icon 3     Icon 4     Icon 5     Icon 6     Icon 7    
Icon 8     Icon 9     Icon 10     Icon 11     Icon 12     Icon 13     Icon 14    
Message:

HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.

 

Instant Graemlins Instant UBB Code™
Smile   Frown   Embarrassed   Big Grin   Wink   Razz  
Cool   Roll Eyes   Mad   Eek!   Confused    
Insert URL Hyperlink - UBB Code™   Insert Email Address - UBB Code™
Bold - UBB Code™   Italics - UBB Code™
Quote - UBB Code™   Code Tag - UBB Code™
List Start - UBB Code™   List Item - UBB Code™
List End - UBB Code™   Image - UBB Code™

What is UBB Code™?
Options


Disable Graemlins in this post.


 


T O P I C     R E V I E W
irishchieftain
Member # 1473
 - posted
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A5978-2002May11.html

One of the things that this article claims is that the cost of a Maglev guideway would be $100 million per mile (ouch! electrified HSR corridors, at approximately $5 million per mile, sound like bargains by comparison).

IMO, the only way to get Maglev to become a desired medium is to get freight haulage into it. Imagine double-stackers zipping along a Maglev guideway at 300 mph or so...? (limited by curvature, not by grade as much)
 

MPALMER
Member # 125
 - posted
Where would the terminals be? Would the cities really allow them to be anywhere near the current downtown rail stations?
 
Mr. Toy
Member # 311
 - posted
I agree that it would be a colossal waste of money. A 300MPH maglev train on a 40 mile project would be overkill. The minutes saved would be inconsequential on a short run, and certainly not worth the cost.

A longer run such NYC to DC, which might make better use of the technology, would cost a whopping $22 billion. As much as Amtrak has swallowd up in 30 years, and more than the entire annual federal aviation budget.

Now for a real laugh. According to the article, the ultimate goal is to get a maglev train from Boston to Atlanta. At $100 million per mile that would cost $131 billion, which is about 1.7 times the annual highway budgets of the federal government AND all 50 states combined, just for one train!

Methinks certain transportation planners have their heads in the clouds.

------------------
Trust God, love your neighbor, and never mistake opinion for truth.
-Mr. Toy

The Del Monte Club Car
 

drew_henderson
Member # 1480
 - posted
Actually its a test segment and does seem to make more sense than the shorter line from downtown Pittsburhg to their airport. At least it could be extended if the technology proves itself.

"The federal government would pay $950 million, local and state governments would pay $500 million, and the rest would come from bonds that would be paid back with fare revenue."

So at $18.75 million (public money) per mile (assuming 80 miles of 2-way structure) its not that unreasonable a cost for a test project. Total cost of the NHV-BOS electrification ONLY upgrade was $400 million for 242 miles.

We can't just live in the present without developing for the future. BUT if this is a choice between developing some urgently needed new corridors with existing technology (or for that matter spending more on NEC maintenance) or this new project then I would have to vote against it as well.
 




Contact Us | Home Page

Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.2




Copyright © 2007-2016 TrainWeb, Inc. Top of Page|TrainWeb|About Us|Advertise With Us|Contact Us