Regarding Mr. Star's post, several thoughts come to mind.First is anecdotal" on my most recent AT ride during Feb 2001, I believe I made the comment over on RRNET that for my morning shower, I had to walk from Massachuetts to New York.
Riddle, what does that mean?
Don't know what the winner gets, as there is no "star" icon available.
However, more to the point. Now that there is a "new hand at the throttle" at 60 Mass effective today, I think near term" priority one" progress can best be measured when Amtrak can report that there are more Superliners available for service than on a comparative previous period.
I believe somewhere I had previously learned that #87's equipment turns for #88 on the second following day, or sits at Hialeah for some 33 hours. This is simply indicative of the "operational self sufficiency" that was forced upon Amtrak (and let's simply say that Warrington had no alternative but to structure operating plans around that dictum)and resulted in committing capital (4 sets of equipment for 87-88 when three could suffice)in a less than efficient manner so that operating expense (a third trick at HIA)could be saved.
But it does not appear that President Gunn is being confronted with any mandates of "operational self-sufficiency", and that is likely just as well. Amtrak will never make a dime - EVER; it is time to accept that and all one must do is to run the trains in a economic and efficient manner. With the high degree of public acceptance that Amtrak enjoys, the rest will take care of itself.