RailForum.com
TrainWeb.com

RAILforum Post A Reply
my profile | directory login | register | search | faq | forum home

» RAILforum » Passenger Trains » Amtrak » Cutting Costs » Post A Reply

Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon: Icon 1     Icon 2     Icon 3     Icon 4     Icon 5     Icon 6     Icon 7    
Icon 8     Icon 9     Icon 10     Icon 11     Icon 12     Icon 13     Icon 14    
Message:

HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.

 

Instant Graemlins Instant UBB Code™
Smile   Frown   Embarrassed   Big Grin   Wink   Razz  
Cool   Roll Eyes   Mad   Eek!   Confused    
Insert URL Hyperlink - UBB Code™   Insert Email Address - UBB Code™
Bold - UBB Code™   Italics - UBB Code™
Quote - UBB Code™   Code Tag - UBB Code™
List Start - UBB Code™   List Item - UBB Code™
List End - UBB Code™   Image - UBB Code™

What is UBB Code™?
Options


Disable Graemlins in this post.


 


T O P I C     R E V I E W
Buslady
Member # 1266
 - posted
They can cuts one cost by keeping ONE paint scheme for the trains! There's what...4 different kinds?!?!?

 
TheAmtrakMole
Member # 1698
 - posted
What is even more scary than the number of paint schemes Amtrak has, is the fetish that some foamers have for them. Even though I've been an Amtrak employee for many years, I couldn't care less how the equipment is painted. I'm waiting to be enlightened why 'paint schemes' are such a popular topic.

------------------

[This message has been edited by TheAmtrakMole (edited 06-27-2002).]
 

MPALMER
Member # 125
 - posted
Paint schemes, number of exhaust vents, carpet color, engine rosters, etc.... it's all a bit like collecting race horse stats or baseball stats...all just part of the diversion and something to keep railfans occupied.
 
dilly
Member # 1427
 - posted
On the other hand. . . many newer railfans have no memory of passenger service in the pre-Amtrak era (or even of Amtrak's very early years, when its motley collection of inherited equipment made for some very interesting-looking trains).

That's not to say the service was entirely wonderful. But every railroad had its own distinct personality - different engines, different rolling stock, different interior configurations and decoration, different paint schemes, different on-board food, etc. Train riding (and watching) was a feast for the eyes. And that goes for the freight trains as well.

I love traveling on Amtrak. But along with K Mart, Starbucks, and the Gap, it's typical of the overall homogenization this country has undergone over the past few decades.

Apart from the number on the side of the car and (perhaps) the color of the seats, one Superliner or Amfleet II looks exactly like the next. So it's not surprising that some people, at least, become obsessed with tiny details and minor variations that most of us wouldn't notice.

[This message has been edited by dilly (edited 06-27-2002).]
 

Gilbert B Norman
Member # 1541
 - posted
This whole paint charade boils down to two things.

1) An outside industrial designer (now do you really think they will do it "in house") must be hired each time they choose to have a new "image design" (five in 31 years)

2) The cost of taking perfectly presentable equipment and repainting it just because someone else came out on top of a "Whose on First" skit as "60 Mass".

[This message has been edited by Gilbert B Norman (edited 06-27-2002).]
 




Contact Us | Home Page

Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.2




Copyright © 2007-2016 TrainWeb, Inc. Top of Page|TrainWeb|About Us|Advertise With Us|Contact Us