RailForum.com
TrainWeb.com

RAILforum Post A Reply
my profile | directory login | register | search | faq | forum home

» RAILforum » Passenger Trains » Amtrak » E-MAIL from Train Riders Assoc. of California » Post A Reply

Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon: Icon 1     Icon 2     Icon 3     Icon 4     Icon 5     Icon 6     Icon 7    
Icon 8     Icon 9     Icon 10     Icon 11     Icon 12     Icon 13     Icon 14    
Message:

HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.

 

Instant Graemlins Instant UBB Code™
Smile   Frown   Embarrassed   Big Grin   Wink   Razz  
Cool   Roll Eyes   Mad   Eek!   Confused    
Insert URL Hyperlink - UBB Code™   Insert Email Address - UBB Code™
Bold - UBB Code™   Italics - UBB Code™
Quote - UBB Code™   Code Tag - UBB Code™
List Start - UBB Code™   List Item - UBB Code™
List End - UBB Code™   Image - UBB Code™

What is UBB Code™?
Options


Disable Graemlins in this post.


 


T O P I C     R E V I E W
reggierail
Member # 26
 - posted
Subj: A Dark Day for Long Distance Trains [TRAC E-Bulletin / Editorial]
Date: 6/28/02 2:54:50 AM Pacific Daylight Time
From: trac@omsoft.com (Train Riders Association of California)

TRAC Members & Associates--

The press has spoken: once again the feds bail Amtrak out at the
last moment, this time for a few weeks. Some are breathing a sigh of
relief. I am not. I haven't felt so disheartened since we lost the
Pioneer, the Desert Wind, the National Limited, the Floridian, the
Lone Star and the North Coast Hiawatha.

Let's cut right to it here: California's corridors will survive,
although the loss of a federal partnership may force frequency cuts.
They'll find a way to run our commuter lines, possibly after a few
days without service. But . . . . .

THIS IS AN ATTACK ON THE LONG DISTANCE TRAINS

If you doubt this, read today's (Thursday) article by Bob Withers of
the Herald-Dispatch in West Virginia. This is the finest article
I've read on the national situation and is worth reading it total [ http://www.herald-dispatch.com/2002/June/27/LNtop2.htm ]. Here are
the important paragraphs not reported elsewhere:

" . . . . . A key sticking point in the debate has been what to do
about Amtrak's long-distance trains, including the Chicago-Washington
Cardinal.

Mineta met with new Amtrak President/CEO David L. Gunn about 10 days
ago and offered the carrier a $100 million bridge loan to cover
operations through the end of August, said Karina Van Veen, an Amtrak
spokeswoman in Washington, D.C.

But Gunn, who is committed to saving the national Amtrak system in
its entirety, turned him down because the deal would have required
Amtrak to immediately begin dismantling its long-distance network and
concentrate services in corridors only.

Gene Poon, a travel agent with Sheehan's Travel in Rohnert Park,
Calif., whose specialty is Amtrak, told The Herald-Dispatch that he
was told the Cardinal was the No. 2 train on the cut list, second
only to the Los Angeles-Orlando Sunset Limited.

"They would probably be the first to go," Poon said.

Next, Mineta met with the Amtrak board of directors Monday to make
the same offer over Gunn's head. The board also turned him down. Gunn
has made his position clear since assuming office May 15 that
Amtrak's national system should be preserved, not dismembered . . . .
. "

GIMMIE A "YOU", GIMMIE A "PEE"

Why is the Bush Administration gunning for our long-haul trains?
Well . . . . .

* Vice Presidient Dick Cheney served on the UP Board of Directors
until recently.

* UP laid a half mile of temporary track to the 2000 GOP convention
site in Philadelphia to accommodate UP business cars.

* Union Pacific Railroad was honored Tuesday night by the Newcomen
Society of the United States at the Petroleum Club in Houston. Dick
Davidson, chairman and CEO of Union Pacific Corporation, was the
guest of honor. Former President George Bush introduced Davidson.

* After Semptember 11, UP made a commitment to paint American flags
on all it's road units (red-white-blue & yellow? Uk!) while
continuing to employ a full time lobbying group in DC which, among
other things, lobbies against Amtrak.

* The recent anti-Amtrak New York Times article "Amtrak Must Die"
spent multiple paragraphs attacking just one train: the Sunset
Limited. The author actually argues "Cutting the Sunset Limited
might actually result in fewer trucks on the roads because it would
be easier to ship freight by rail if Amtrak weren't given priority on
the Union Pacific's tracks." (Writers note: If you want a
guaranteed laugh, tell Sunset Limited passengers Amtrak has priority
on the Sunset Route.)

* Secretary Mineta said in his speech Monday "[Amtrak] has embraced
numerous business plans--including some that have set it in
competition with the freight railroads . . . . . Amtrak's current
route network provides too many services with limited market appeal
at high operating costs to the federal government."

A REPUBLICAN RAIL-SUPPORTER CAN BE OUR BEST ALLY

This isn't a rant against corporations in general or the Republican
Party. Indeed, passenger rail has some strident supporters in the
Republican Party and they may be our best allies of all--they have
influence within the party and may prove to be the swing votes that
turn this thing around. A true conservative understands the overall
economic truths of transportation, a false conservative with power
gives favors in exchange for gifts.

TRAC SUPPORTS ALL CALIFORNIA RAIL SERVICE

TRAC's mission is to better inter-city rail service in California.
We are as committed to supporting the four interstate trains that run
within and terminate in our state as we are to California's corridor
services and future services (such as an overnight San Joaquin and
high-speed rail). Zephyr, Southwest, Starlight, Sunset. I don't
intend these to be historical references.

A large percentage of our members are older members, and many are
TRAC members precisely because long-haul trains are how they travel
from state to state--indeed, how YOU travel from state to state.
This is why we partner with NARP in the national campaign to save
Amtrak. We at TRAC have heard you--preservation of the long-haul
trains is one of your highest priorities. I wish to assure you that
I have put aside nearly everything the last two weeks to assist in
the national fight. And let me thank all of you who have done your
part by writing and emailing--it has made a difference.

AMTRAK'S SHINING STAR

There is one amazing bright ray of hope in all this darkness, and his
name is David Gunn. As stated above, Gunn refused Mineta's offer
outright, and in a show of support the Amtrak Board rejected Mineta's
offer as well. An Amtrak conductor told me today that in that now
famous Gunn statement--"It's OK to call our guests 'passengers'
again"--he won the loyalty of tens of thousands of Amtrak employees.
On Monday Gunn told his employees in a letter, "You can depend on me
to do everything possible to keep our operations going; that's my
commitment to you. I did not take this job to shut down our
railroad."

DOES THE SUNSET RUN TOO FREQUENTLY? OR NOT FREQUENTLY ENOUGH?

Mr. "Ga Ga Choo Choo" Tierney, writer of the 'Amtrak Must Die'
article, states that the Sunset Limited lost more per passenger than
any other train and prompted Representative Harold Rogers to ask "Why
is this route still being run?''

I turn Mr. Roger's question around and ask "Why is this route still
being run TRI-WEEKLY?" Did Tierney every consider that maybe the
reason this train loses so much per passenger is because it is one of
only two trains which still run less than daily in the entire Amtrak
system and thus the Sunset Limited's labor and fixed facilities are
being horribly underutilized?

HALF THE AMOUNT / TWICE THE CIRCUS

The Bush administration is reportedly miffed at David Gunn for making
the Amtrak debate a 'public spectacle'. I am miffed at a large
corporation for wasting all our taxpayer dollars to fuel a huge
national debate that may, in the end, if they are lucky, get a few
trains off their rails. This may take a few million off Amtrak's
operating costs but won't amount to a hill of beans in the overall
picture.

The Bush Administration only gave Amtrak $100 million in this weeks
final deal. Thanks to Gunn, the strings to dismantle the long
distance trains were not attached, but it leaves open the need for
Amtrak to ask for an additional $100 million in August. Do we go
through this whole circus again? Giving half the amount needed keeps
travelers and all those that do business with Amtrak in a state of
uncertainty which only hurts Amtrak's ability to generate revenue and
maintain business relationships.

TIME FOR AN OFFENSIVE STRATEGY

The Sunset Limited has been a tri-weekly train for three decades now,
and that is INSANE. This is economically unsound and has kept this
train on the bottom of Amtrak's performance list too long. I call
on rail supporters everywhere to abandon the defensive plan and go on
the offensive by demanding of our politicians:

* AMTRAK MUST GET THE FULL $200 MILLION SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATION

* AMTRAK MUST BE FULLY FUNDED FOR FY2003

* ROUTE AND FREQUENCY CUTS ARE UNACCEPTABLE, PERIOD

* THE CARS AT BEACH GROVE MUST BE REPAIRED

* THE CARDINAL AND SUNSET MUST BE UPGRADED TO DAILY SERVICE IN FY2003

This is not a slippery slope argument--this IS a slippery slope. The
Sunset Limited runs on--um--whose tracks? The Starlight and the
Zephyr run on those same company's tracks.

[FROM THE TRAC OFFICES] I SEE TRAINS, PLANES & AUTOMOBILES

As I started writing this E-Bulletin this afternoon, the California
Zephyr drifted by, visible from the TRAC offices through a break in
the trees just east of the Sacramento Amtrak station. That's a sight
I intend to see for just as long as I see cars (and trolleys) on the
streets below and planes in the skies above.

Rest now, fellow rail supporters, as congress does. We'll need that
energy again in a few weeks. Thanks for all you have done.

--
--Alan C. Miller
Administrative Director
Train Riders Association of California
(916) 557-1667

------------------

 

Chip
Member # 1733
 - posted
Great article! Like I said when I came on the board, I'm a conservative republican and I support Amtrak! Everytime I've ridden the long distance trains, particularly during peak seasons, they are loaded with passengers! I think part of the problem is people assume Amtrak is the only form of transportation that is publicly funded, but that's not the case. Airlines, even before 9/11, were publicly funded and the air traffic controllers work for the federal government. Roads and highways, as we all know, are funded too. I know; I'm preaching to the choir, but I like to preach. LOL!
 
jimmymac
Member # 1182
 - posted
So, the Bush Administration is in the UP's pocket? Now all of the shenanigans since the ARC report make sense. Warrington's threat to shut down only the long distance trains; the Bush Administration delay in responding to the ARC report and Mineta's offer of $100 million; and the attempt to extort consessions from Mr. Gunn at the last minute. I feel another e-mail to my senators and congress person is needed. Thanks for the info.
 



Contact Us | Home Page

Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.2




Copyright © 2007-2016 TrainWeb, Inc. Top of Page|TrainWeb|About Us|Advertise With Us|Contact Us