RailForum.com
TrainWeb.com

RAILforum Post A Reply
my profile | directory login | register | search | faq | forum home

» RAILforum » Passenger Trains » Amtrak » Remembering the 231 » Post A Reply

Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon: Icon 1     Icon 2     Icon 3     Icon 4     Icon 5     Icon 6     Icon 7    
Icon 8     Icon 9     Icon 10     Icon 11     Icon 12     Icon 13     Icon 14    
Message:

HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.

 

Instant Graemlins Instant UBB Code™
Smile   Frown   Embarrassed   Big Grin   Wink   Razz  
Cool   Roll Eyes   Mad   Eek!   Confused    
Insert URL Hyperlink - UBB Code™   Insert Email Address - UBB Code™
Bold - UBB Code™   Italics - UBB Code™
Quote - UBB Code™   Code Tag - UBB Code™
List Start - UBB Code™   List Item - UBB Code™
List End - UBB Code™   Image - UBB Code™

What is UBB Code™?
Options


Disable Graemlins in this post.


 


T O P I C     R E V I E W
F40PHR231
Member # 1350
 - posted


Things are rather slow right now, and I'm in the mood to do some rambling! Mechanical work is being done this and next week on the 231, I also requested the 30-day extension that's offered in the Sales Order. Since the holidays slowed things down, it was ideal to get the extension.

However, as anxious as everybody is, I miss the good ol' days when F40s dominated the rails. Unfortunately, as young as I am (not yet old enough to drink some booze), I didn't get to see many of them in action. (Photo of F40 #231 on Cascades Talgo near Mt Rainier, used with permission.)

231 was the only one that I got to see and photograph, and ride behind on numerous of trips starting back in 1994 to the last month it was in Portland.

I used to come home from work each day, and anxiously wait for the northbound Coast Starlight in anticipation that the 231, or another F40 would be on it.

Now that the F40s are virtually extinct from Amtrak, I no longer anticipate looking forward to the Coast Starlight's GE engines. I quit doing the daily PDX Reports that I offered online (since I saw basically each train, why not report it) -- and I miss the good ol' days, even if it was just a year ago.

The best I can do, for myself, fellow F40 fans, the railroad community, is to preserve that piece of history. Look at the PAs, SDP40Fs, P30CHs, FL9s, E units, they were EVERYWHERE during their prime time.

And they sure disappeared fast. That's a learning lesson for us all, is that when things are going to go, do not delay on preserving one. Think of today's P42s, F59PHIs, Dash-9s, SD70Macs, Geeps... Before you know it, they'll be gone, and you'll be wondering about how fast time flew by.

The F40 #231 came literally within days of being scrapped. In the past 30 days, over 50 F40s at Beech Grove have gone bye bye. The photos show it well, and it is not a pretty sight. It takes a group effort to make preservation happen -- any volunteer involved with preservation of any locomotive (whether it be labor, funds, supplies or a word of support) should give themselves a pat on the back.

It hasn't hit home yet, but every time I look at a photo or video of the 231, I can't help but smile.

 

Mr. Toy
Member # 311
 - posted
Great photo! While I am not the type to get excited about a particular locomotive model(personally I think the Genesis is better looking), I do understand the importance of preserving history.

When you mention all those F40s being scrapped, it reminds me of similar stories of WWII warbirds going to the junkyard in the late 40s. Nobody thought of them as something worth preserving until later. Thanks to your foresight at least one representative of the era will be available for future generations to see.

------------------
Trust God, love your neighbor, and never mistake opinion for truth.
-Mr. Toy

The Del Monte Club Car
 

tubaallen
Member # 2057
 - posted
I never realized that they used any of those old F40s to pull the Talgos! That's weird lookin!
 
efin98
Member # 1943
 - posted
probably just a temporary fill-in while one of the usual locomotives were in the shops. It is a great picture, one of a few that I have seen that features the F40s Thank you for saving that F40 and hopefully it can survive in your care for decades to come!
 
F40PHR231
Member # 1350
 - posted
It ran pretty often on the Talgos, wasn't any different than a F59PHI. (The F40s was used on the original pendular Talgos) -- but the new ones only saw F40 231, 315, 340, 353, 369, 383, and 399.

231 was on it the most of all. I certainly plan to take good care of it, and maybe one of these days, we can recreate the scene as shown in the photo! (oh I can dream can't I?)
 

coach34135
Member # 1979
 - posted
I think it's great that 231 is safe & sound. Honestly we didn't think it was going to happen, you really impressed us! It's a huge feat to rescue a locomotive.
And boy do I understand preserving history. While I can't preserve a locomotive, my preservation efforts will one day go to a Crown Coach schoolbus, most people will say, why a schoolbus? This particular brand of bus was different from ALL others. It was built and looks different. Unfortunantly an old one isn't readily available because this idiotic state of California has a bus replacement program where the old bus must be crushed and the bus I want( a 1978 2 axle 90psgr) will prolly go that way.

I always said the F40 was the Crown Coach of the railroads, the best!

 

The Chief
Member # 2172
 - posted
Congrats, Chris!
Let's hope this publicity helps your donation gathering.

Engine wins a reprieve, RR buff now needs to find a ride home for the big locomotive http://oregonlive.com/search/index.ssf?/base/exclude/1043327340177890.xml?oregonian


 




Contact Us | Home Page

Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.2




Copyright © 2007-2016 TrainWeb, Inc. Top of Page|TrainWeb|About Us|Advertise With Us|Contact Us