RailForum.com
TrainWeb.com

RAILforum Post A Reply
my profile | directory login | register | search | faq | forum home

» RAILforum » Passenger Trains » Amtrak » Bush seeks more state power over Amtrak » Post A Reply

Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon: Icon 1     Icon 2     Icon 3     Icon 4     Icon 5     Icon 6     Icon 7    
Icon 8     Icon 9     Icon 10     Icon 11     Icon 12     Icon 13     Icon 14    
Message:

HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.

 

Instant Graemlins Instant UBB Code™
Smile   Frown   Embarrassed   Big Grin   Wink   Razz  
Cool   Roll Eyes   Mad   Eek!   Confused    
Insert URL Hyperlink - UBB Code™   Insert Email Address - UBB Code™
Bold - UBB Code™   Italics - UBB Code™
Quote - UBB Code™   Code Tag - UBB Code™
List Start - UBB Code™   List Item - UBB Code™
List End - UBB Code™   Image - UBB Code™

What is UBB Code™?
Options


Disable Graemlins in this post.


 


T O P I C     R E V I E W
StonewallJones
Member # 887
 - posted
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20030729/ap_on_go_ot/amtrak_finances_8

Bush Proposes Amtrak Reform Plan Which Would Give States More Control

"Congressional critics say President Bush's six-year plan to force the states to pick up more of Amtrak's costs ignores short-term problems that could shut down the railroad. Bush sent a bill to Congress on Monday that would end Amtrak's monopoly on intercity passenger rail service, minimize federal subsidies and promote competition among railroad operators"

[This message has been edited by StonewallJones (edited 07-29-2003).]
 

Mr. Toy
Member # 311
 - posted
"Amtrak President David Gunn said he wasn't consulted or briefed on the proposed legislation."

And I might add, neither were the states.

The Bush administration is both arrogant and ignorant if they think they can put together a coherent plan without input from the principle participants!!!

In another article I read the plan points to the Cascades service as a good example of how multi-state funding agreements would work to maintain interstate service. Never mind that the Republican's in Oregon are about to shut down funding for the Oregon segment. This example shows that you can't rely on the fickle nature of 48 different state budgets to maintain a national system.

Here's a link to the official DOT information. I haven't had a chance to read it yet. http://www.dot.gov/affairs/dot06303.htm

------------------
Trust God, love your neighbor, and never mistake opinion for truth.
-Mr. Toy

The Del Monte Club Car

[This message has been edited by Mr. Toy (edited 07-29-2003).]
 

RRCHINA
Member # 1514
 - posted
Of course any legislation sent by an administration to Congress is just a starting point and Congress will see to it that interested parties are brought in to the discussions.

We can not expect states with little Amtrak
operation to become involved, like Idaho or
Arkansas for example. But there can and should be a place for the states with substantial transportation needs to look at
having Amtrak be part of the solution.

This is a start. Lets let it play out.
 

Mike Smith
Member # 447
 - posted
I'm totally satified with our Senator. So far, she's done the right thing, time after time after time...... http://www.railspot.com/txarp/kbh-longview.htm
I'm a proud member of TXARP.

Time to write Bush again and complain about Mineta's extremely short-sighted vision for Amtrak, passenger rail, and our Nation's transportation needs.


 




Contact Us | Home Page

Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.2




Copyright © 2007-2016 TrainWeb, Inc. Top of Page|TrainWeb|About Us|Advertise With Us|Contact Us