RailForum.com
TrainWeb.com

RAILforum Post A Reply
my profile | directory login | register | search | faq | forum home

» RAILforum » Passenger Trains » Amtrak » Have you ever ridden on foreign rail systems!? » Post A Reply

Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon: Icon 1     Icon 2     Icon 3     Icon 4     Icon 5     Icon 6     Icon 7    
Icon 8     Icon 9     Icon 10     Icon 11     Icon 12     Icon 13     Icon 14    
Message:

HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.

 

Instant Graemlins Instant UBB Code™
Smile   Frown   Embarrassed   Big Grin   Wink   Razz  
Cool   Roll Eyes   Mad   Eek!   Confused    
Insert URL Hyperlink - UBB Code™   Insert Email Address - UBB Code™
Bold - UBB Code™   Italics - UBB Code™
Quote - UBB Code™   Code Tag - UBB Code™
List Start - UBB Code™   List Item - UBB Code™
List End - UBB Code™   Image - UBB Code™

What is UBB Code™?
Options


Disable Graemlins in this post.


 


T O P I C     R E V I E W
Railbug
Member # 2764
 - posted
WAKE UP! We are getting short-changed by our government which makes-believe it has an up-to-date rail system! Our system could be much better, deserves better funding, should have faster runs on every route and should hve lower fares consistantly. You'll see what I mean when you compare the Japanese Rail system and the systems of France, Spain, Germany and even Canada to our Amtrak!
 
CK
Member # 589
 - posted
Railbug, "WAKE-UP!"......you are preaching to the choir.
The vast majority of the educated members on this board understand that "our system could be much better".
We all strive, in our separate ways, to do what we can to improve "our" rail passenger service.
Amtrak is a far from perfect system, yet it is a safe & enjoyable method of transportation that many of us enjoy and a great way to see the U.S. of A!
 
Gilbert B Norman
Member # 1541
 - posted
I will readilly agree that the publicly funded rail passenger service products offered in Japan, France, and Germany are superior to any over here.

Regarding Spain, I will recuse from any judgement; suffice to say, my experiences on the RENFE some 12 years ago were abysmal

Now regarding a comparasion between Amtrak and VIA, there is simply no comparasion.

Considering East-West (transcontinental) services, out of a potential six Mississippi River-West Coast routings, Amtrak offers Daily service over three and Tri-Weekly over a fourth. VIA by comparasion offers Tri-Weekly service over one of a potential two.

Further Amtrak trains have been completely reequipped, VIA still makes do with now fifty year old "hand me downs", the "new" off the shelf European equipment they purchased would not even be accepted by a US carrier if it were to be proffered in interchange.

Regarding any comparasion between their Quebec-Windsor "Corridor" and ours, is less than a comparasion than with the long distance services. Here, Amtrak owns and operates a real railroad, where does VIA do same (I understand a few bits and pieces about)?

While apparently VIA does make a commendable effort to keep their aging equipment clean and in a roadworthy state of repair, as well as provide a "consistent" on-board service product, comparasion is still "apples and oranges". Likely, the most essential thing done by VIA is to provide transportation to locations that simply have NO alternatives whatever. Amtrak of course provides transportation in the Northeast without which, severe economic impact would occur.

So for those of us 'below the 49th", let's stop for a moment and count our blessings that, however imperfect it may be, we got what we got. After all, the US could be Mexice where, for all intent and purpose, the passenger train is extinct.

But I guess it is always be fun to dream what could be if "we the people" were prepared to direct the same portion of our Gross National Product to passenger rail as any of the nations noted by Mr Railbug presently do.

[This message has been edited by Gilbert B Norman (edited 09-22-2003).]
 

irishchieftain
Member # 1473
 - posted
I take it that you mean in the same way that "we the people" are currently induced to pay indirectly for highways, local streets, airports, waterways, air traffic control, public transit, and all the rest of that…?
 
sutton
Member # 1612
 - posted
"Further Amtrak trains have been completely reequipped, VIA still makes do with now fifty year old "hand me downs", the "new" off the shelf European equipment they purchased would not even accepted by a US carrier if it were to be proffered in interchange."
Regarding the above statement by Norman, after having traveled this past summer on Via Rail's The Canadian, all I can say is that I'll take their 'hand me downs' over most off Amtrak's equipment anyday! It runs well, is clean, and the cars with the Pullman berths are a joy! The diner and lounge cars look like new!
And the toilets work!


 

sutton
Member # 1612
 - posted
well, to answer the original question, yes, I've traveled throughout Europe by train. Of course as a railfan I like LONG trips Most in Europe aren't that long. Best rides were in Switzerland/Germany, and the worst rides were in what was then Yugoslavia. My god, the worst trains on Earth! Disgusting.
I liked the Russian trains. Traveled St. Petersburg to Sofia Bulgaria. 72 hours. Lost the 'diner' after one day so everyone subsisted on the food they had brought along. I'd wondered at departure why my Russian friends gave me tons of chicken and bread.
Still, the four-berth rooms were nice, clean, friendly people. LOTS of time for looking at the birch trees.
Any other experiences out there?
 
Charles Reuben
Member # 2263
 - posted
Funny you should mention the Yugolavian trains, Sutton. I was travelling from Triesta, Italy to Greece on a Eurailpass when I had the opportunity to check out the Yugolavian railroad system. The year must have been 1978.

It was an old train, with compartments as well as open coach seating. But the train was packed and it smelled so badly that I initially decide to traverse the entire country between cars. The departure of the train was delayed for three hours because somebody had been murdered right before it was scheduled to leave.

I was beginning to think that perhaps it was a mistake to take the train to Greece when I was approached by a young man who said he would give me a seat in his compartment if I agreed to carry a package into Yugolavia. What was in the package, I asked. Blue jeans for my grandmother, he said. I agreed to his terms.

When the train finally left Triesta and entered Yugolavia, all the passengers were instructed to get off at the border. It was bitterly cold and night was closing in on us when we were approached by border guards wearing long black leather jackets who took all our passports and proceeded to interogate us individually. They asked the usual questions and when they wanted to know what was in the bag that had been entrusted to me I replied, "blue jeans, for my grandmother." That seemed to satisfy their curiosity and they moved on.

The border guards had us wait outside the train for a good half hour before they finally returned with our passports and we were allowed back into the train. I went back into the crowded train and found the fellow who had given me the blue jeans and he welcome me into his compartment. I remember a heavily varnished, wooden panelled room with seats that opened up to lay flat.

No sooner had I removed my backpack and given them their bluejeans then I was made to feel very welcome. A "wodka" bottle was thrust into my hand as well as a huge chunk of bacon. The young man and his comrads entertained me throughout the night and into the next day with their companionship, their food, their songs and their liquor.

[This message has been edited by Chucky (edited 09-22-2003).]
 

jp1822
Member # 2596
 - posted
I second Sutton's comments regarding VIA - customer and onboard service, as well as equipment maintenance and onboard amenities are superior Amtrak's. I've said this for a while - Amtrak could learn a few things from VIA on these topics. Traveled VIA's system extensvely this past year - what a pleasure it was.
 
David
Member # 3
 - posted
Regarding Gilbert B. Norman's comments re: the comparison between Amtrak and Via, I agree it is difficult to do a proper comparison. Canada is a larger country than the United States, but has only about 10% of the population. But Canadians travel by train at a higher ratio than their neighbours. The last numbers I saw show that Amtrak carries about six times as many passengers as does Via, but has 10 times the population base from which to draw these passengers.

As for Via's 50-year-old ageing equipment, most of these Budd-built transcontinental cars are in excellent shape, having been rebuilt in the early 1990s. There are problems with the windows in some of the domes, and some "cosmetic" work needs to be done in some sleeping car interiors, but the cars ride well and the heating and air conditioning generally work well. These sleeping cars offer economical upper and lower berths and reasonably-priced roomettes (with sink and toilet) for single travellers, as well as larger rooms.

As for the Renaissance trains, many US and Canadian railfans will reject them outright because they are "foreign." I have taken four trips in sleepers and three day trips on these trains and I can say there is much to recommend about them. To be sure, there are many things I don't like about them, but I suggest there are many critics who have never even seen one, let alone ridden one, who might have a more balanced opinion if they approached the subject with an open mind.

[This message has been edited by David (edited 09-22-2003).]
 

RRRICH
Member # 1418
 - posted
I have only ridden VIA's Canadian twice, once in 1983 and once in 1999. Although I have not ridden VIA nearly as much as I have ridden on AMTRAK, I will agree that, on both of my VIA trips, I recall NO problems with air conditioning, toilets, doors, or any of the things which have been pointed out as perennial problems with AMTRAK equipment. And yes, the "Silver and Blue" (1st class) service on VIA, at least in 1999, was MUCH better than a lot of the "1st class" service I have seen on AMTRAK (with the possible exception of the Pacific Parlour Car on the Coast Starlight, which I believe is EXCELLENT!). But, like our system here, VIA also has the problems of sharing the rails with freight companies (Canadian National on the Canadian route), and is subject to the same type of host railroad delays as we see in AMTRAK. But the "50-year old cars" on VIA's Canadian are kept in excellent shape.
 
sutton
Member # 1612
 - posted
Hey Chucky,
What a great experience--after the initial customs at the border. I've had some times like that in Eastern Europe. Good people there!
I remembered an interesting experience on a Greek train, from Athens to Thessalonika (about ten hours). We were in our compartment when this green fluid started spraying across the windows. The train stopped. Apparently something to do with a blown gasket. I don't know the mechanics, but there was oil on the corridor floor that had come in through open windows. Very messy, and of course the train was held up while the conductors, engineers and helpful passengers helped look for "big rocks" to plug up something on the engine. That was the day I paid the conductor two bucks to upgrade to first class
Too cool.
 
sutton
Member # 1612
 - posted
Hey Chucky,
What a great experience--after the initial customs at the border. I've had some times like that in Eastern Europe. Good people there!
I remembered an interesting experience on a Greek train, from Athens to Thessalonika (about ten hours). We were in our compartment when this green fluid started spraying across the windows. The train stopped. Apparently something to do with a blown gasket. I don't know the mechanics, but there was oil on the corridor floor that had come in through open windows. Very messy, and of course the train was held up while the conductors, engineers and helpful passengers helped look for "big rocks" to plug up something on the engine. That was the day I paid the conductor two bucks to upgrade to first class
Too cool.
 
CoastStarlight99
Member # 2734
 - posted
The USA is not popular for train travel. Does that mean the it is the goverments responsibility to fund Amtrak. In Italy where I am from they have "Railroad of the State" which is funded by taxpayers. In the USA simply to few people take trains. Do I think that AMTRAK's transportation compared to European HIgh-Speed trains is better than that...No.....But I do belive that I am amased at the rate Amtrak is movieng and I mean good...It is incredible that they are stillr running. and I am a huge fan of Amtrak. I do agree with Railbug on some circumstances, stiupid republicand IE: Gerorge W. Bush spen money on dumb things compared to Amtrak which is in need. George bush cares more about lineing up his guns, then a good Transportation Service. Amtrak is not to blaim, It's incredible how few people do take Amtrak, I went to San Jose from Los Angeles on the Coast Starlight the other day, And only aybe 30 people were going there, go to LA Airport you've got hundreds...I wish more people took trains!!


EMAIL ME YOUE THOUGHTS,
Later, ANTON L., IE: SUPERLINER #9
 

sutton
Member # 1612
 - posted
coaststarlight99,
Agree with many of your sentiments. BTW, I'v been to Italy and loved it! Beautiful places, but I really like central part.
As for Amtrak, it's not used very much because Americans are in a hurry, moreso than most people in the world. We don't have a sense of taking a true vacation, of traveling as they do in Europe, where a six-week vacation is the norm. Here, Americans are lucky if they get a week or two. So, if you don't get much time off to begin with, and you are in a hurry, you fly (same as in Europe).
Perhaps if we ever get high-speed rail, things will change. Until then, taking a train for 99% of Americans is 'a fun time on the train'. They take it because they want the experience. AND, if the experience isn't going to be pleasant (i.e. nonworking toilets and rude employees), they will NOT take the train, the funding under ultra conservatives will dry up, and Amtrak will derail. Facts of life.
Scott
 
Charles Reuben
Member # 2263
 - posted
Hey Coaststarlight & Sutton,

Aren't you too exagerating a bit? Exactly what planet to do you hail from?

Every time I get on either the Southwest Chief or the Coast Starlight, I have an enormous amount of trouble getting a seat to myself. The coaches are packed to the gills and the dining car is in such demand that I have resigned myself to waiting until the last seating lest they throw me out before I have properly finished my meal.

Thirty people on the Coast Starlight? Where do you dream up these numbers? Did you learn how to count where you learned how to spell? Give me a break!

And Sutton, I like you a lot but where on earth did you come up with that 99 percent figure? When you figure in all the Amish people who take the train for philosophical reasons, when you figure in handicapped people who find the train a more humane means of travel, when you take in people like myself who are 1) terrified of flying and 2) unable to fly because of an ear condition, then I think you will find that percent imaginative, to say the least.

The harsh reality is that sometimes Mr. Taxpayer is going to have to pay for something he doesn't necessarily choose to use. For example, I don't have kids but I still have to pay for the education of your kids. I'm not a senior citizen, but I still have to provide for the elderly. I didn't polute the Hudson River with PCBs, but I still have to contribute to its cleanup.

Why oh why are you gentlemen so determined to deprive me of the one itsy-bitsy thing that I enjoy from the tax dollars that I pay?

[This message has been edited by Chucky (edited 09-24-2003).]
 

irishchieftain
Member # 1473
 - posted
In the USA simply to few people take trains

Not so simple. And Chucky is quite correct—the LD trains that do run are almost to the point of being SRO. It is quite easy to state that "too few people take trains" in the USA, especially when there are too few trains running for them to take. A real Catch-22, yes…?

The harsh reality is that sometimes Mr. Taxpayer is going to have to pay for something he doesn't necessarily choose to use

Just appending all the highways in this country that I, yourself and others will never drive on to your brief list…not to mention all the airports that we will never fly to/from also…

[This message has been edited by irishchieftain (edited 09-24-2003).]
 

CoastStarlight99
Member # 2734
 - posted
Chucky,
I love your attitude..LOL
What do you mean the trains are crowded? They are practicly empty somtimes..YES 30!
But, I agree with you about the DIning Car you need a doumb reservation, and the prices are very high//Do they really kick you out though?

ANTON

 

Charles Reuben
Member # 2263
 - posted
I'm glad you have a sense of humor, coaststarlight.

Like in any fine restaurant, the headwaiter (or whatever he is called on a train) will attempt, hopefully in a tactful manner, to get you to relinquish your seat when it looks like you are done eating. Since reservations are scheduled every half hour and the dining room is very popular, it is imperative that people eat in a timely fashion.

Since I like to eat in a leisurely fashion, I typically schedule my dinner in the last slot. This way they let me stay as long as I want.

As far as food prices are concerned, considering its quality and presentation, I find the prices to be quite fair, particularly for breakfast and lunch. Dinner can be a little pricey but all things considered, it's probably worth the expense.

One lovely alternative to dinner in the diner is a pizza in the cafe car (at least on the Southwest Chief). I was absolutely amazed to discover that the cheese pizza contained absolutely no preservatives, food colorings or other non-essentials. Furthermore, the pizza did not come back "to haunt me" after the fact. I hope they still stock that microwaveable gem.

As far as that figure of 30 people that keep coming up: As you know the cool thing about trains is that people have a way of climbing aboard and then getting off the train at various times. Perhaps at one point in your trip there were 30 people. Perhaps you were travelling on Christmas Day. I don't know what the deal is, but the number you persist in bringing before this forum is unusually low and certainly not within the realm of my experience.

Also, bear in mind that the Coast Starlight "competes" against the Surfliner for passengers, at least from Los Angeles to San Luis Obispo. The Surfliner runs 12 times a day (I think) and that train, with its ultra-modern, ergonomic seating, clean bathrooms and stairways that make sense, attracts a lot of passengers.

If memory serves me correctly, your destination was at the end of the line and there may very well have been 30 people on the train at that point. But that is, afterall the magic of train travel, people can get on and off the train, thus skewing any reasonable attempt to make sense of it all.

[This message has been edited by Chucky (edited 09-25-2003).]
 

20th Century
Member # 2196
 - posted
I particularly remember an overnight journey from Amsterdam to Copenhagen in a couchette.
It was 1979 or 1980. My 2 friends and I were in a room with 3 berths on each side. It was was shared with 3 other travelers. Somewhere in northern Germany during the night the train was split into 3 sections. They were loaded into the hull of the ferry which sailed to the coast of Denmark where a Danish locomotive pulled us to Copenhagen for an a.m. arrival......on time.
 
CoastStarlight99
Member # 2734
 - posted
Chucky,

I am amased about the Dining car, that they kick you out..If you don't have meal vouchers from a sleeper the dining car is more expensive then a NICE restarunt. But, the Cafe/Snack (lounge) car does have good snacks, but I couldnt stand there microwave cheeseburgers, I look forward to trying the pizza though.

THX,
Anton
 

Gilbert B Norman
Member # 1541
 - posted
Mr. 20th Century crossed the Orrsund, but that crossing is now in the history books, having been replaced with a rail highway bridge.

I believe the only place today that occupied passenger railcars are loaded aboard a ferry is accross the Straits of Messina between Italy and Sicilly.
 

20th Century
Member # 2196
 - posted
Thanks for the info Gilbert. At least they replaced it with a rail highway bridge, NOT just a highway bridge. That improvement must shorten the rail travel time considerably. Well, I am happy to discover I had the pleasure to experience that special journey before it's demise.
 
karen
Member # 2791
 - posted
There's an interesting account of a ride on the Trans-Siberian railway here: http://www.mariesworldtour.com/entries/0511.html

The author made a round-the-world trip, starting in New York, without the use of airplanes. She also has a nice account of riding the Lakeshore Limited and Southwest Chief on Amtrak, which apparently held its own against the many other countries' rail systems.
 

denmarks
Member # 2748
 - posted
I traveled on a short distance train in China few years ago as part of a tour. The bathrooms alternate between western and oriental between cars. The oriental bathrooms were no more than a hole in the floor.
 
espeefoamer
Member # 2815
 - posted
For New Year's 1978 some friends and I traveled from Mexicali,Mexico to Gudalajara on a 4 day trip.Our train had 4 coaches a diner and about 15 Pullmans with an ex NYC observation car.We went by Pullman and had a great time.The food in the diner was good and the scenery was great.We saw desert at the start,but after Mazatlan,it turned tropical,with a mountainous rejion near the end of the ride.All in all.it was a great trip.
 
dilly
Member # 1427
 - posted
I've done quite a bit of rail traveling in Europe. The widespread belief (among Americans anyway) that every French, Dutch, or German train is spotless and state-of-art is really a myth.

Even within a single country, European trains can range from 21st century modern to absolutely abysmal. The worst make the average Amfleet coach seem luxurious.

With that said, I once took an overnight rail trip, south along the Nile Valley, in an Egyptian sleeping car.

I've gotta admit, neither Amtrak, nor any European railway, can quite compete with waking up at dawn to see water buffalo, camels, and 5000 year-old ruins outside your compartment window.
 




Contact Us | Home Page

Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.2




Copyright © 2007-2016 TrainWeb, Inc. Top of Page|TrainWeb|About Us|Advertise With Us|Contact Us