David
Overall, the NEC trains have more of a "commuter rail" feel than those on most Amtrak routes, even though they use the same equipment.
Regardless of your direction of travel, the entire NEC (from Boston to Washington) is virtually one continuous stretch of urban and suburban sprawl. There are lots of great old factories from the late 1800s and early 1900s along the way. But for the most part, the few stretches of natural beauty are merely "okay."
In other words, don't expect the high quality scenery you'll find along many other Amtrak routes. In the Northeast, almost all of it was built over, and paved over, many years ago.
[This message has been edited by dilly (edited 12-28-2003).]
First, Dilly, the NEC is not *entirely* paved over. New Jersey is the most densely settled state in the US, and CT is mostly a suburb, but there are several rural areas along the NEC.
From the BOS end, here are some scenic highlights north to south.
1) Along the shore of Long Island Sound from Westerly, RI to New Haven, CT. At places, the tracks are right on the beach. The crossing of the Thames River at New London is an especially nice spot. Water is on the left side of the train.
2) From the Hell Gate Bridge to Sunnyside Yard. The view of the NY skyline (right side of train, SB) can't be beat, day or night.
3) Coming into PHL, the crossing of the Schuylkill River affords a nice view of the towers of Center City, and a nice view of the boathouses along the river (especially at night, when they're outlined with lights). Left side of train.
4) The best scenery between NYP and WAS lies between Elkton, MD (south of Wilmington) and Baltimore. The tracks skirt the shore of Chesapeake Bay for a considerable distance (left side of train, best view in fall and winter when the leaves are down), cross the Susquehanna River on a high bridge (literal high point of the trip), then cross two long bridges over the Bush and Gunpowder Rivers (both arms of Chesapeake Bay. This stretch takes about 40 minutes to cover, so by no means is the Northeast "entirely paved over".
And of course, for the railfan there's the thrill of 135 MPH to 150 MPH speeds, multiple track, lots of trains, flyover junctions, and a service frequency that can be found nowhere else in America.
quote:
Originally posted by rresor:
. . .by no means is the Northeast "entirely paved over".
Actually, I didn't say the landscape bordering the NEC tracks has been "entirely" paved over. Only that most of it has been.
Personally, I love seeing old factories and other industrial sites along railroad right-of-ways. I find them preferable to "pretty scenery." But many train travelers simply find them grim. And boring.
It's true that there are some noteworthy, widely-spaced sights along the NEC -- notably Chesapeake Bay -- although I wouldn't consider Philly's generic skyline particularly memorable.
For most of the route, however, you're gazing out at nothing but industrial and suburban sprawl, mile after mile after mile.
If you're a passenger like me, who finds man-made ugliness interesting, you'll have a swell time. But if you're in the market for a classically "scenic" train experience, you're apt to find the NEC disappointing.
In the case of Mr. Italiancanuck89, it all comes down to what he's looking for.
[This message has been edited by dilly (edited 12-28-2003).]
As far as the NEC, I think NY to BOS has "prettier" scenery with the LI sound and all. The run to WAS is more industrial, but equally interesting to look at.
My suggestion, do them BOTH!
Jon
Hope this helps!
------------------
http://www.marylindsayrr.vze.com
The price is about 50% higher for the Penn-WAS run.
Personally, I think once is worth it but usually enjoy the overall experience of the Regional more but maybe I'll start another post on that subject.