RailForum.com
TrainWeb.com

RAILforum Post A Reply
my profile | directory login | register | search | faq | forum home

» RAILforum » Passenger Trains » Amtrak » Amtrak Support » Post A Reply

Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon: Icon 1     Icon 2     Icon 3     Icon 4     Icon 5     Icon 6     Icon 7    
Icon 8     Icon 9     Icon 10     Icon 11     Icon 12     Icon 13     Icon 14    
Message:

HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.

 

Instant Graemlins Instant UBB Code™
Smile   Frown   Embarrassed   Big Grin   Wink   Razz  
Cool   Roll Eyes   Mad   Eek!   Confused    
Insert URL Hyperlink - UBB Code™   Insert Email Address - UBB Code™
Bold - UBB Code™   Italics - UBB Code™
Quote - UBB Code™   Code Tag - UBB Code™
List Start - UBB Code™   List Item - UBB Code™
List End - UBB Code™   Image - UBB Code™

What is UBB Code™?
Options


Disable Graemlins in this post.


 


T O P I C     R E V I E W
City of Miami
Member # 2922
 - posted
The following quote is part of a response I received today from CA Senator Barbara Boxer who is on the Commerce Science and Transportation Committee of the Senate. Perhaps we could all encourage our Senators to support S. 104. Can you imagine?


Just as the federal government helps to
fund highways and airports, so too is it
important to assist in maintaining a viable
national passenger rail system. That is why I am
pleased to be a cosponsor of the National Defense
Rail Act, S. 104. This bill would authorize $2.7
billion annually for Amtrak, and it proposes
$1.55 billion annually for grants to states for
high-speed rail planning and implementation.

Amtrak is a key component of our nation's
rail transportation infrastructure. I fully
support the $1.8 billion dollars that Amtrak has
requested in order to continue to provide safe
and efficient rail travel for our nation.

Please be assured that I will fight for
Amtrak. Please do not hesitate to contact me
again about this or any other issue of concern to
you.

 

M190
Member # 3009
 - posted
And here is the text...
http://www.theorator.com/bills108/s104.html
 
RRRICH
Member # 1418
 - posted
City and M190 - I just read through S. 104 -- what is the current status of that? I see it was introduced last year.

Also, concerning the very last section of the bill concerning the Alaska Railroad -- is passenger service on the Alaska Railroad being discontinued?

[This message has been edited by RRRICH (edited 08-25-2004).]
 

M190
Member # 3009
 - posted
No clue rrrich, I just found that m'self.
 
espeefoamer
Member # 2815
 - posted
Wow! A Democrat does something I agree with.
Tomorrow morning I expect to read in the paper that Amtrak has recieved equal funding with highways and airlines,World peace is declared, and the Seattle Mariners win the World Series!:-)

------------------
Trust Jesus,Ride Amtrak.

[This message has been edited by espeefoamer (edited 08-25-2004).]

[This message has been edited by espeefoamer (edited 08-25-2004).]
 

Mike Smith
Member # 447
 - posted
espeefoamer;
There were quite a few democrats endorsing S. 1991 in 2002. Even Kerry was one of a number of sponsors.

Of course he changed his mind the next day, but he was one of the "in crowd" for a day....
 




Contact Us | Home Page

Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.2




Copyright © 2007-2016 TrainWeb, Inc. Top of Page|TrainWeb|About Us|Advertise With Us|Contact Us