RailForum.com
TrainWeb.com

RAILforum Post A Reply
my profile | directory login | register | search | faq | forum home

» RAILforum » Passenger Trains » Amtrak » What happened to the proposed service to Des Moines » Post A Reply

Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon: Icon 1     Icon 2     Icon 3     Icon 4     Icon 5     Icon 6     Icon 7    
Icon 8     Icon 9     Icon 10     Icon 11     Icon 12     Icon 13     Icon 14    
Message:

HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.

 

Instant Graemlins Instant UBB Code™
Smile   Frown   Embarrassed   Big Grin   Wink   Razz  
Cool   Roll Eyes   Mad   Eek!   Confused    
Insert URL Hyperlink - UBB Code™   Insert Email Address - UBB Code™
Bold - UBB Code™   Italics - UBB Code™
Quote - UBB Code™   Code Tag - UBB Code™
List Start - UBB Code™   List Item - UBB Code™
List End - UBB Code™   Image - UBB Code™

What is UBB Code™?
Options


Disable Graemlins in this post.


 


T O P I C     R E V I E W
mr williams
Member # 1928
 - posted
Sorting through my stuff I came across the Amtrak route map from c. 2000-01. On it there are four proposed routes in yellow:
1. Boston-Portland,Maine(up and running)
2. LA - Las Vegas (we all know about that!)
3. Meridian - Dallas (didn't one of the Amtrak board live in Meridian?) and a fourth one....

4. Chicago - Des Moines via Iowa City and Clinton

The strange thing is, whilst the Vegas and Meridian propoals have been frequently debated,I don't ever remember the Des Moines line ever being mentioned.

I know that Des Moines is included in the mid-west high speed rail scheme - did that supercede it? If not, what happened? Also, when did Des Moines last have passenger service?
 
CG96
Member # 1408
 - posted
There are other members of the Forum who are more knowledgeable regarding this topic. I think that this route segment was part of the Amtrak Growth Strtegy of the late 1990s (the same one that prodiced such things as Mail and Express Service, and the Lake Country Limited) and died its death when the connecting service between Boston and Chicago was rejected by Norfolk Southern. Another factor which lead to this routes' demise was the cost of upgrading the ex-CRIP track. If it were to go via Clinton, IA (the former CNW overland main) then this train would have had to deal with UPRRs attitude towards all things passenger rail, and it has been discussed ad nauseum just how hostile UPRR is to Amtraks' presence over its rails.

To sum it up, this route was a part of a strategy that was cancelled due to: 1. lack of funding, 2. The freight railraods extreme hostility towards Amtrak hauling any freight anywhere at all, and 3. Certain freight rr landlords hostility towards Amtrak, period.
 
Gilbert B Norman
Member # 1541
 - posted
'.....Dead Dead Dead....and may the Lord have mercy on your soul."

This was part of the Warrington Gang's Network Growth Strategy, and of course was to be a primarily freight train. The ouute was to be Chi--MILW-Nahant-DRINW-Rock island-CRIP-Des Moines.

The schedule would have been overnight and be assured would have been "more bounce to the ounce" over the Rock Island - and not much better over the MILW.

Oh and excuse me, I should note that the MILW successor is the Iowa Chicago & Eastern andf the Rock Island's is the Iowa Interstate RR. I have no idea who owns the 'Dry Line'
 
notelvis
Member # 3071
 - posted
quote:
Originally posted by Gilbert B Norman:
'

The schedule would have been overnight and be assured would have been "more bounce to the ounce" over the Rock Island - and not much better over the MILW.

Akin to 'sway all the way' in an upstairs superliner roomette between Louisville and Indianapolis aboard the sadly short-lived 'Kentucky Cardinal'. When the sleeper and the boxcars came off this the handwriting was on the wall for that train.
 
George Harris
Member # 2077
 - posted
I had thougth that this was to have been the old CRIP "Spine Line" all the way. One word for the porblem: UP. According to them, this is heavily congested.

The route: Minneapolis, Manly, Des Moines, Allerton, 493 miles, in 1948 there was a 9h15m schedule and a 12h15m schedule each way.

It seems so blooming obvious. This could be a Twin Cities to Texas train with car swaps at Kansas City so you would have MSP to Los Angeles out of it as well.
 
CG96
Member # 1408
 - posted
Mr. Harris: the poster was inqiring about the Chicago - Des Moines route, not the MSP - KC "spine line."
 
George Harris
Member # 2077
 - posted
quote:
Originally posted by CG96:
Mr. Harris: the poster was inqiring about the Chicago - Des Moines route, not the MSP - KC "spine line."

Duhh. Thanks for the correction. Should have had more coffee this morning, or considering how bad a miss this was, check for brain activity. If all else fails, reread the question. Seems like I somehow picked up on "Rock Island" and "Des Moines" and missed all else. Glad I'm riding public transit home tonight.
George
 
TwinStarRocket
Member # 2142
 - posted
That "spine line" was me Mr. Harris -the old "Twin Star Rocket" route. I was only 2 years old in 1948, but in 1958 it still made the MSP-KC run in 9h15m (I have the timetable).

That same schedule today would connected MSP to both the Zephyr and the Chief in both directions with minimal layovers. There would have to be a stop in Chariton, IA to connect to the #5/6.

It could continue on the old Lone Star and current Heartland Flyer route to Texas. From the twin cities of DFW to the twin cities of MSP. Perhaps Houston as well. From the North Star State to the Lone Star State. The Twin Star Rocket.

Five million shivering snowbirds would have Amtrak as an option. Millions of retirees would have access to their grandchildren on the tundra.

Finally someone understands. I am getting so tired of the drive to Iowa or Missouri.
 
North American Railroader
Member # 3398
 - posted
It would be nice for a northern extension of the Heartland Flyer, it would allow a person to bypass Chicago. Of course cities like Des Moines would benefit from such service, and so would those of us in the South, giving us a second option for North - South travel.
 
Gilbert B Norman
Member # 1541
 - posted
Be assured the Rock Island never referred to its MSP-KCY as the "spine line'. That term was an invention of the consultants that stumbled over one another when Federally guaranteed loans under the 70's legislation known as the 4R Act, were sought to rebuild the line.
 
CG96
Member # 1408
 - posted
I wonder what these consultants would have called the CGW St.Paul - KCY main, via Oelwein, IA?

The Hill-&-Dale line? (just kidding, of course) [Smile]
 



Contact Us | Home Page

Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.2




Copyright © 2007-2016 TrainWeb, Inc. Top of Page|TrainWeb|About Us|Advertise With Us|Contact Us