RailForum.com
TrainWeb.com

RAILforum Post A Reply
my profile | directory login | register | search | faq | forum home

» RAILforum » Passenger Trains » Amtrak » Heartland Flier » Post A Reply

Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon: Icon 1     Icon 2     Icon 3     Icon 4     Icon 5     Icon 6     Icon 7    
Icon 8     Icon 9     Icon 10     Icon 11     Icon 12     Icon 13     Icon 14    
Message:

HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.

 

Instant Graemlins Instant UBB Code™
Smile   Frown   Embarrassed   Big Grin   Wink   Razz  
Cool   Roll Eyes   Mad   Eek!   Confused    
Insert URL Hyperlink - UBB Code™   Insert Email Address - UBB Code™
Bold - UBB Code™   Italics - UBB Code™
Quote - UBB Code™   Code Tag - UBB Code™
List Start - UBB Code™   List Item - UBB Code™
List End - UBB Code™   Image - UBB Code™

What is UBB Code™?
Options


Disable Graemlins in this post.


 


T O P I C     R E V I E W
amtrakwine
Member # 4265
 - posted
Has anybody have any feelings about this train? In looking at the map it is so close in distance to making a connection with the SWC in Kansas . That would be a direct connection from Texas. They also are running 2 sante fe hi liners, which I think are very comfortable.
 
Kiernan
Member # 3828
 - posted
I was living in Paul's Valley, Oklahoma, and surveying at Chickasaw National Recreation Area--neat place--around the turn of the millennium when the Heartland Flyer had recently started running. I never got a chance to ride it, and the Oklahoma pundits were all predicting its imminent demise.

I'm glad it's still running.
 
notelvis
Member # 3071
 - posted
Rode it from Ft. Worth to OKC in 2002. Have kept meaning to get back and ride it southbound but just haven't had the opportunity. Pretty decent little train and seemingly pretty popular.
 
PullmanCo
Member # 1138
 - posted
The issue of the Heartland Flyer linking up to Newton, KS, and joining 3/4 is a simple one:

It's a 403(b) train paid for by Oklahoma.

Kansas has not, and by my read, (as a resident on the Missouri side of Kansas City metro) will not, pony up $$$. Kansas Legislature is under court mandate to pony up half a Billion (yes, that is B as in thousand million) dollars for education funding.

They can't even get to that number!

Do not count on this train reaching northward anytime soon.
 
RRRICH
Member # 1418
 - posted
Of course, many years ago, in AMTRAK's early years, the "Texas Chief" did run from Chicago through Newton, KA, then south through Wichita and into Oklahoma, where it used the same route as the Flyer. I thought I remember reading somewhere that BNSF (ATSF then) had downgraded the line from Newton through Wichita and southward, and that was why the full Texas Chief route is no longer used.
 
RRCHINA
Member # 1514
 - posted
The BNSF line south from Newton through Wichita is in very good condition and is considered part of the TRANSCON, BNSF's high speed-high density line between CHI and LAX. There is no double track between Mulvane and Ellinor, except for short segments, and so when traffic density dictates the DS routes trains over the Wichita route between Ellinor and Mulvane.
 
PullmanCo
Member # 1138
 - posted
Texas Chief (Lone Star after ATSF withdrew rights to the "Chief" trade/service mark) was part of the Carter Administration cuts in Amtrak IIRC. It died in 1979.
 



Contact Us | Home Page

Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.2




Copyright © 2007-2016 TrainWeb, Inc. Top of Page|TrainWeb|About Us|Advertise With Us|Contact Us