RailForum.com
TrainWeb.com

RAILforum Post A Reply
my profile | directory login | register | search | faq | forum home

» RAILforum » Passenger Trains » Amtrak » Link: Air: $2,500 Amtrak: $216 » Post A Reply

Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon: Icon 1     Icon 2     Icon 3     Icon 4     Icon 5     Icon 6     Icon 7    
Icon 8     Icon 9     Icon 10     Icon 11     Icon 12     Icon 13     Icon 14    
Message:

HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.

 

Instant Graemlins Instant UBB Code™
Smile   Frown   Embarrassed   Big Grin   Wink   Razz  
Cool   Roll Eyes   Mad   Eek!   Confused    
Insert URL Hyperlink - UBB Code™   Insert Email Address - UBB Code™
Bold - UBB Code™   Italics - UBB Code™
Quote - UBB Code™   Code Tag - UBB Code™
List Start - UBB Code™   List Item - UBB Code™
List End - UBB Code™   Image - UBB Code™

What is UBB Code™?
Options


Disable Graemlins in this post.


 


T O P I C     R E V I E W
amtraksupporter
Member # 5619
 - posted
From the Fargo paper:

"Geri Lewis, Fargo, letter: Saving lots of money by going with Amtrak"

http://www.in-forum.com/Opinion/articles/185633
 
Gilbert B Norman
Member # 1541
 - posted
I think it safe assumption that one criticism of the Amtrak Coach LD product never heard is "outlandish" fares.

While there could well be conjecture on this point, I do not think Sleeper fares are outlandish; they simply are "priced to market", and for a single traveler, they are quite competitive with 'sane' auto travel, i.e. hotel for overnights after each ten hours of driving vice a 'few winks' at a truckstop.
 
DesertSpirit
Member # 3848
 - posted
I'll pretty much pay whatever they want. I'm not getting into a plane.
 
train lady
Member # 3920
 - posted
Desert Spirit.. I am with you. My flying days are over!!I am not going to pay to be the fifteenth sardine in a can built for twelve, in a seat with my knees up around my chin, squeezed in between 2 others and to top it off the seat in front of me pushed back into my lap. That is if we get off the ground and don't have to spend 2 days in the airport. I don't do sleeping on the floor any more.
 
Rick Morris
Member # 5347
 - posted
I absolutely agree. Being what they call a "passenger of size", I have to pay for 2 seats on a plane. Not going to happen. And with Amtrak's seats wider than a plane, that's a huge comfort. I'd sooner take Amtrak than fly anymore.
 
notelvis
Member # 3071
 - posted
quote:
Originally posted by Rick Morris:
I absolutely agree. Being what they call a "passenger of size", I have to pay for 2 seats on a plane. Not going to happen. And with Amtrak's seats wider than a plane, that's a huge comfort. I'd sooner take Amtrak than fly anymore.

I am not a small person by any means (6'4" , 295 lbs) and have not yet been classified as a 'passenger of size'.

I feel like that's pretty much a subjective label depending on who is making the call and I am concerned that sooner or later an airline ticket clerk is going to demand double payment in order to let me on a plane. If/when that does happen it's unlikely that I'll bring myself to fly again short of absolute neccessity.
 
mr williams
Member # 1928
 - posted
At 6' 0" and 275 lbs us lardies must stick together!
 
George Harris
Member # 2077
 - posted
quote:
Originally posted by mr williams:
At 6' 0" and 275 lbs us lardies must stick together!

If you are in a plane, you will, whether you want to or not.
 
train lady
Member # 3920
 - posted
Tonight's news broadcast showed people sleeping all over the floors and chairs in various airports. The terrible ice storms have forced many flight cancellations and people are stranded. They shoulda taken the trains
 
tarheelman
Member # 6095
 - posted
quote:
Originally posted by train lady:
Tonight's news broadcast showed people sleeping all over the floors and chairs in various airports. The terrible ice storms have forced many flight cancellations and people are stranded. They shoulda taken the trains

If they had taken the trains, not only would they have been able to get where they wanted to go, but they would've saved money, too---the fare costs less (in some cases, *a lot* less).
 
rresor
Member # 128
 - posted
Well, I'm not sure I wholly agree with the above. At 5'10" and 260, I'm not skinny, but I fit into a plane seat. And if I want to go from PHL to BOS, I can do it for less than $100 RT on Airtran or about $160 on Amtrak -- and Airtran takes 1:15 while Amtrak takes six hours if it's on time.

As for ice storms, we had them here last winter. They brought down signal cables and my 1:45 trip from PHL to WAS on Amtrak took more than three hours.
 
notelvis
Member # 3071
 - posted
Airtran is one of the carriers I look at when I need to fly. I like that they have non-stop flights from Charlotte to both BWI and Chicago Midway......and on Boeing 717's. Not big planes but big enough. The small regional jets are very uncomfortable for me.....and that starts the instant I board since I can't even walk down the aisle without ducking.
 
train lady
Member # 3920
 - posted
Be that as it may if you had an airline ticket you could have spent several days and nights in the airport. Instead you spent 3 hours on a warm train.
 
cassrr
Member # 1834
 - posted
quote:
Originally posted by train lady:
Be that as it may if you had an airline ticket you could have spent several days and nights in the airport. Instead you spent 3 hours on a warm train.

Add to that the two hours (+/-) spent at the airport prior to boarding, not having to remove your shoes, belt, pocket change, etc to board, not having the contents of your carry-on items publicy displayed during the search....yep, add me to the train only list! Doubtful Delta will miss me much anyway.
 



Contact Us | Home Page

Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.2




Copyright © 2007-2016 TrainWeb, Inc. Top of Page|TrainWeb|About Us|Advertise With Us|Contact Us