What brought me back here the other day was hearing a rumor in the Railpac newsletter that the dining car of the CZ had caught fire, gutting the interior, while being serviced in Oakland on or about January 3rd. Anybody know what happened?
Posted by smitty195 (Member # 5102) on :
There was a coffee maker that was left plugged in, and it either shorted out or something and caught fire. The train was sitting in the Oakland Amtrak yard when it happened. The diner was completely destroyed, and there is major smoke damage to the adjacent sleepers and coaches. The entire train is still sitting in Oakland. For the next day's #6 that was to depart, the passengers were bussed to Reno where they caught a turned #5.
I'm not sure when the cars will be removed from Oakland, but from what I hear from a few AmEmployees, the sleepers and coaches have to be deep-cleaned at a minimum to get the smoke damage out. The diner would normally be totaled, but since Amtrak is already short of diners (thanks to the ridiculous Cross Country Cafe disaster), there is talk of rebuilding it. I've seen the pictures, and it would have to be completely rebuilt from the ground up. Holes were cut in the roof by Oakland Fire Dept, the sides are all buckled in, and the interior is all black and burned---both upstairs and downstairs.
I'm not sure why the coffee pot was left plugged in, and I also don't know if they have a policy to unplug appliances when the cars are not in use. I know that whenever I take a trip somewhere, I always unplug my coffee pot because it's just a machine, and machines can break! Back when I was a firefighter, I responded to several kitchen fires that were the result of an appliance (toaster or coffee maker) being shorted out and catching fire.
Posted by MDRR (Member # 2992) on :
FWIW- Coffee makers, toasters, all appliances are left plugged in on food service cars.
Posted by Gilbert B Norman (Member # 1541) on :
Question--
How feasable would it be to offer "complete meals' in a #370XX Diner if the Lounge end tables were replaced with the standard Amtrak Diner booths?
One of these cars was assigned to the 2008 ABC-TV "Good Morning America" train; somehow I can't see Diane Sawyer chowing down on Cross Country Cafe fare. On this strength, I would think that the car's existing kitchen facilities can still prepare the 'complete meal', but since I've never set foot in one of such, I have no first hand knowledge if this is the case.
With 17 such cars on the roster and only 10 needed to protect the existing 21-22 (TE in forumese), 29-30 (CL), 58-59 (CONO) assignments, I would think, even if six cars were assigned to 27-28 (EB) as has been proposed, in place of the three to 29-30, there are still a few surplus cars that could be converted back to full Diners at 'chump change' cost and would represent considerable savings over rebuilding the Diner involved in the Oakland fire incident.
Posted by notelvis (Member # 3071) on :
Has any attempt to utilize the Cross-Country Cafe cas as intended even been made at all?
How much you wanna bet that one CCC car cycles into California Zephyr service 'as is' with no modification whatsoever?
Posted by Gilbert B Norman (Member # 1541) on :
Mr. Presley, your comment suggest that the existing kitchen facilities within the #370XX can prepare "complete meals'. However, I would think that Amtrak should consider converting several of the cars back to existing #380XX booth configuration.
Now what will be interesting is if the plans move forth, and the likely outcome that 38034 (the car involved) will be stricken from the roster, to add Dining service to 27-28 and what kind of menu will be offered. Since 7-8 still offer "traditional' Dining service, this means that the Portland passengers will get "short changed' if only the Cross Country Cafe menu is offered. Somehow I think the Portland passengers will be directed to the Portland Diner - why risk an injury having some 85 year old. who never knew how to walk aboard a train, walk six cars forward?
Posted by Southwest Chief (Member # 1227) on :
Does anyone know the number of the burned diner?
Posted by smitty195 (Member # 5102) on :
The car number is 38034.
Posted by a meyer (Member # 4954) on :
Last winter I was on the Southwest Chief from Chicago to Los Angeles. They substituted a Cross Country Cafe for the regular diner due to unavailable equipment in Chicago.
They served the complete meals I had experienced in regular SWC diners in the past.
Andy
Posted by palmland (Member # 4344) on :
I believe meals on 27/28 are currently served from the lounge car. So a CCC with more complete kitchen facilities should still represent an improvement over a box from the lounge.
If Amtrak wanted to do it right, they would have all sleepers at the head end with the CCC serving as first class lounge CHI-Spokane. There the CCC and Portland sleeper would be switched out and added to the coaches from the rear. But somehow I think we won't see that kind of enroute switching again.
I wouldn't be surprised to see the CCC be just a Portland-Spokane car to minimize cost.
Posted by Gilbert B Norman (Member # 1541) on :
Eureka...the forum works!
Now that Mr. Meyer has stepped forth and reported that the "complete meal' menu was offered in a 37XXX car, I would think it quite likely that one such car will be regularly assinged to a consist set otherwise calling for a 380XX.
Simply "doing the math' shows that 29 380XX Diners are needed to protect the consists to which they are assigned. On Track shows that 38 such cars, exclusive of the likely lost 38034, are available for service. The 9 excess cars are of course necessary spares.
Just strike 38034 and be done with it.
Posted by smitty195 (Member # 5102) on :
Does anyone know if 38034 is a Superliner I or Superliner II? I can't remember where the number cutoff is for those orders.
Posted by Ocala Mike (Member # 4657) on :
I think 38034 was in the consist for our trip on No. 5 3 years ago. When I heard about this diner fire, my first thought was that someone ordered the flatiron steak well-done.
Posted by notelvis (Member # 3071) on :
If that's the beef dish that tastes like a decent potroast, I'd think the gravy would have doused the flames before any damage was done.
Does anyone have photos or a link to a place with photos of the damaged diner?
Posted by Gilbert B Norman (Member # 1541) on :
Mr. Smith, 38034 is an S-I
But judging from reports from over where I have been banned (sometimes I can read such as when there is a link at, say, Google), the car became quite a "krispy kritter' with the heat causing structural damage.
Posted by smitty195 (Member # 5102) on :
Thanks, GBN.....
I would be more than happy to post pictures if someone would tell me how to do it. I have a Mac if that makes a difference.
Posted by pismobum (Member # 2628) on :
Amtrak lists 32013, 32085, and 33032 as "fire damaged" in the Oakland incident in addition to the "toasted" 38034 diner.
Posted by Southwest Chief (Member # 1227) on :
quote:Originally posted by pismobum: Amtrak lists 32013, 32085, and 33032 as "fire damaged" in the Oakland incident in addition to the "toasted" 38034 diner.
Two sleeping cars! That hurts. Even worse since 32013 is a fully refurbished sleeper.
Posted by Judy McFarland (Member # 4435) on :
Boxed dinner on 28 brought to your room by the car attendant. I'm guessing the same thing is true for breakfast on 27.