Knowing this link will probably disappear in the not so distant future, here are the basic facts:
9 cars, 2 engines, 128 passengers, 14 crew (seems light), location about 20 miles west of Dodge.
speed quoted as about 75 mph (who knows how accurate that is) "5 cars on side" (picture looks like 4 with one tilted about 20 degrees), 27 injuries, "none life threatening" time: "just after midnight"
Some of the above from other sources than the link, but the like was the most thorough.
PullmanCo Member # 1138
posted
Here's AP coverage carried by the Houston Chronicle
Looks like 3-4 will either A) do the Transcon, B) take the Union Pacific to Denver then divert South for a few days or C) run on an as yet to-be-built shoo-fly. From the photos, either BNSF has to build a shoo-fly siding, or the cars have to be evacuated and the track re-set before service on the traditional Santa Fe can continue.
Gilbert B Norman Member # 1541
posted
Mr. Harris, nine cars would mean V-Bag, 2 Sleepers, Diner, Lounge, 3 Coaches.
From photos circulated by media, three Coaches, are on their side, Lounge part way, and presumably everything else is upright and maybe even on the rails.
I'd think Amtrak can "live" through its slow season without that equipment. Maybe they can even get the Coaches back for peak season. Worst case; a #370XX Diner-Lounge pinch hits for the Sightseer. Of course, since Auto Train still runs with two Lounges after the threat to cut one off, there is one Sightseer in that pool. Yank it and put a 37- in its place. Nobody will miss it - at least I wouldn't.
Lest we forget; "If you've seen one Pine Tree, you've seen 'em all".
posted
As I write this, 4(14) is leaving Lamy, NM, with no advertised service disruption. At the same time, 3(14) left Newton, KS, just under an hour late and is somewhere off route in mid New Mexico - presumably the Trans-con but I'm not familiar with its exact routing.
Yesterday's passage of 3 and 4 through the area had both calling at Newton, KS, and Albuquerque, NM but nowhere in between as far as I know. What's curious is that they appear to not have used the Trans-con throughout but taken a side trip to serve Albuquerque. Quite possibly some very rare trackage!
Maybe George Harris can enlighten me with the routing - #3 is near Vaughn, NM currently. If I remember I'll try to find some other nearby town in a couple of hours.
Southwest Chief Member # 1227
posted
quote:Originally posted by Geoff Mayo: What's curious is that they appear to not have used the Trans-con throughout but taken a side trip to serve Albuquerque. Quite possibly some very rare trackage!
Not really.
Take the transcon down from Newton. Divert at Belen to Albuquergue via Isleta. Wye at ABQ. Reconnect with transcon as normal at Dalies.
I believe this is the normal rerouting when taking the transcon. ABQ is typically a part of any reroute.
Although I've always wondered if there is a permanent line change that ABQ would be cut out in favor of Belen.
This rerouted #3 came by around noon by me (Yorba Linda CA) today.
Gilbert B Norman Member # 1541
posted
Chicago scrounged up enough cars for a normal 3 (15) consist. Observed it "of sorts" today, as it was on 2 track with a freight on 3 track, which was waiting for #3 to clear so it could be switched over to 2.
Amtrak gets priority on the Aurora Sub.
Southwest Chief Member # 1227
posted
Anyone know consist info of derailed #4?
All I have been able to get so far from online pics was diner 38044 and lead loco 153. A new viewliner II baggage was also in the consist.
Guess this is the first "incident" with a new Viewliner II?
yukon11 Member # 2997
posted
The latest news says a cattle feed truck hit the track and shifted it about a foot, before the derailment:
quote:Originally posted by Geoff Mayo: What's curious is that they appear to not have used the Trans-con throughout but taken a side trip to serve Albuquerque. Quite possibly some very rare trackage!
Not really.
Take the transcon down from Newton. Divert at Belen to Albuquergue via Isleta. Wye at ABQ. Reconnect with transcon as normal at Dalies.
I believe this is the normal rerouting when taking the transcon. ABQ is typically a part of any reroute.
Although I've always wondered if there is a permanent line change that ABQ would be cut out in favor of Belen.
This rerouted #3 came by around noon by me (Yorba Linda CA) today.
So this routing has been done on more than a few occasions before? My previous understanding, including that of a permanent de-Ratonification, would be Trans-con all the way - not a side trip to Albuquerque.
Southwest Chief Member # 1227
posted
quote:Originally posted by Geoff Mayo: So this routing has been done on more than a few occasions before?
Yep. Typical way to do it when routing the Chief on the transcon.
However, if the line were to permanently change to the transcon. Then ABQ possibly could be dropped in favor of staying on the mainline through Belen.
But now that they have the new depot in ABQ. And supposedly the wye has been improved, ABQ might have still been on the route even if the line change to the transcon was made...although thankfully it doesn't look like that will happen now.
Here's a map that shows the routing around ABQ:
Southwest Chief Member # 1227
posted
Amtrak and BNSF are suing the Kansas company responsible for the derailment:
posted 