RailForum.com
TrainWeb.com

RAILforum Post A Reply
my profile | directory login | register | search | faq | forum home

» RAILforum » Passenger Trains » Commuter Trains » Susie Q » Post A Reply

Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon: Icon 1     Icon 2     Icon 3     Icon 4     Icon 5     Icon 6     Icon 7    
Icon 8     Icon 9     Icon 10     Icon 11     Icon 12     Icon 13     Icon 14    
Message:

HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.

 

Instant Graemlins Instant UBB Code™
Smile   Frown   Embarrassed   Big Grin   Wink   Razz  
Cool   Roll Eyes   Mad   Eek!   Confused    
Insert URL Hyperlink - UBB Code™   Insert Email Address - UBB Code™
Bold - UBB Code™   Italics - UBB Code™
Quote - UBB Code™   Code Tag - UBB Code™
List Start - UBB Code™   List Item - UBB Code™
List End - UBB Code™   Image - UBB Code™

What is UBB Code™?
Options


Disable Graemlins in this post.


 


T O P I C     R E V I E W
gct29
Member # 1551
 - posted
It all sounded very promising a few years ago, then . . . nothing.

Anyone hear rumblings on when commuter service on the Susquehenna might start? I know it's still on NJT's "master plan," but their site still says that they're waiting for approval to build a yard in Hardyston, as they have been for years. Is that it? Aside from the final environmental red tape, what other hurdles does NJT face? What's the Susquehenna's attitude in all this?

Any information and/or wild guesses would be appreciated.
 

irishchieftain
Member # 1473
 - posted
I think the Susie-Q service debacle is a load of "bollocks", personally. All the nonsense about trying to build a yard in what basically amounts to a dead-end terminus, really. The Susie-Q line (i.e. current) goes to Port Jervis, so why not terminate trains there?!? There's a nice big yard there, with extra space to boot. I'm sure that there's more than just one commuter that may think it a good thing to have train service operating via Warwick and Goshen in Orange County, NY State, again (is it Goshen, or that town between there and Greycourt? I can't remember right now, it's too late at night.)

As for the NYSW line east of Paterson...that ought to get heavy-rail passenger service also. There's just too much focus on that Secaucus Transfer monstrosity, which is one reason the original plan includes duplicated service via Paterson on NJ Transit's current Main Line. They cut out Saddle Brook, Lodi and Hackensack (I say Hackensack because of the lack of service on the PVL by comparison; additional service on the NYSW wouldn't hurt.) Don't get me wrong, there are indeed plans for passenger service on the eastern leg of the NYSW...but it'd be single-track LRT service, terminating at Lodi, not reaching Paterson (who'd want that?) and ooh, guess what, it wouldn't go to Secaucus Transfer either, what a terrible thing. How come there wasn't a Susquehanna Transfer station planned (not the ridiculous bus transfer of the past!) that would transfer people off the NYSW onto the former PRR lines going into NYP, right at the mouth of the tunnel??? How come the genii of the past couldn't do that...??? Never mind...
 




Contact Us | Home Page

Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.2




Copyright © 2007-2016 TrainWeb, Inc. Top of Page|TrainWeb|About Us|Advertise With Us|Contact Us