This is topic Scale decision? HO vs. N in forum Model Railroading at RAILforum.


To visit this topic, use this URL:
http://www.railforum.com/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi/topic/3/350.html

Posted by RHBB (Member # 997) on :
 
I built several HO layouts more than 20 years ago, but have been inactive in model railroading since the late 70s ... I'm ready to get back involved, but I am looking for some definitive reading on comparing N and HO scales. Does anyone have any suggestions? Or personal experiences that dictated their decision on which way to go? Thanks ...
 
Posted by shamus (Member # 657) on :
 
Hi,
I started with 0 scale at the tender age of 7, then went to 00 by the time I was 12. Later in life (Now 65) I had N-scale for quite a number of years, then changed to HO and back to N-scale, and now back into HO for life due to needing reading glasses to see even HO properly. Maybe I should change to 0 again. Hmmmmm

Shamus



 


Posted by slimjim375 (Member # 199) on :
 
Why do you think I went from HOn3 to Sn3 Now I know that car is around here some place.
 
Posted by Seacoast (Member # 1028) on :
 
N Scale has come a long way since
the 1970's! Engines are reliable than
before and there is much more of a selection.
The nice thing about N is that you can
have a small room with a 10 or 12 foot
run with some nice long trains with multiple
engines. Also since the scale is much smaller
than Ho you can compress great scenery into
a small space although personally I like long trains with impressive scenery in N. Try
looking into N Trak if your interested in
getting involved with a club they have
clubs in almost every state in the USA and
usually have huge layouts at train shows
that often have 100+ freight and 15 long
passenger consists

[This message has been edited by Seacoast (edited 08-31-2001).]
 


Posted by Chuck Walsh (Member # 677) on :
 
I have been doing HO for 4 1/2 years and
during that period both N & HO has made tremendous advances in quality. There's no
comparison between todays superior products to those that were made back in the 70's. Go
to a hobby shop and look at both the N & HO
catalogs for product availability. I'm happy
with the HO and still need the assistance of a magnifing lamp/glass to assemble. At my age
of 62 my fingers couldn't handle N.
 
Posted by lynn (Member # 533) on :
 
I started with HO about 15 years ago, then wanted more in a smaller space, so got all N. I coldn't see to work on them very good, so started back with HO. These 71 year old eyeballs don't work like they used to did. The crowning touch, was, a loco stopped, and would jerkj to go, forward and back. Had to take it all apart and found 1 single grain of ballast in the gears. That told me that N was too persnickety for me. I dumped them and now stay strictly HO.

Lynn
 


Posted by Konstantin (Member # 18) on :
 
N-scale is a little less than half the size of HO. That means you can fit almost four times as much into the same area using N-scale rather than HO-scale.

N-scale is good for running long trains over long stretches of track. HO is a better scale if you are thinking more about finely detailed scenery.


------------------
Elias Valley Railroad (N-scale) www.geocities.com/evrr

[This message has been edited by Konstantin (edited 09-01-2001).]
 


Posted by Chuck Walsh (Member # 677) on :
 
It appears from the replys that HO is for Senior Citizens.
Grandpa Chuck.
 
Posted by lynn (Member # 533) on :
 
Chuck, you need some more school-housin' and book learnin'; the word is MATURE citizens.

Lynn
 


Posted by thirdrail (Member # 1031) on :
 
If you want to build railroad models, choose HO, if you want to build a model railroad, choose N.
 
Posted by Konstantin (Member # 18) on :
 
Thirdrail said it perfectly. I completely agree.

------------------
Elias Valley Railroad (N-scale)
www.geocities.com/evrr

 




Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.2