RailForum.com
TrainWeb.com

RAILforum Post A Reply
my profile | directory login | register | search | faq | forum home

» RAILforum » General Forums » Open Discussion » Canada’s Chrystia Freeland wants *nukes* to defend against Trump’s US » Post A Reply

Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon: Icon 1     Icon 2     Icon 3     Icon 4     Icon 5     Icon 6     Icon 7    
Icon 8     Icon 9     Icon 10     Icon 11     Icon 12     Icon 13     Icon 14    
Message:

HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.

 

Instant Graemlins Instant UBB Code™
Smile   Frown   Embarrassed   Big Grin   Wink   Razz  
Cool   Roll Eyes   Mad   Eek!   Confused    
Insert URL Hyperlink - UBB Code™   Insert Email Address - UBB Code™
Bold - UBB Code™   Italics - UBB Code™
Quote - UBB Code™   Code Tag - UBB Code™
List Start - UBB Code™   List Item - UBB Code™
List End - UBB Code™   Image - UBB Code™

What is UBB Code™?
Options


Disable Graemlins in this post.


 


T O P I C     R E V I E W
irishchieftain
Member # 1473
 - posted
Newsweek
quote:
… Chrystia Freeland, former deputy prime minister under Trudeau, warned that Trump poses a direct “threat” to Canada’s sovereignty by saying that the country could potentially become the 51st U.S. state.

Trump has said that Canada is “not viable as a country” without U.S. trade.

Freeland proposed forming stronger defense ties with France and Britain, as their nuclear arsenals could aid Canada “at a time when the United States can pose a threat.” …

The woman was a piece of work demagogue while in office as deputy prime minister (she is looking to claim the job her former boss currently holds), but she is just as bad if not worse out of it. Not that opposition Pierre Poilievre is much better, mind you; they all seem to take the “fifty-first state” wisecrack way too seriously.

The notion of using Britain’s nukes offensively against the USA is something that all Britons ought to regard as unthinkable, to boot. Freeland is hinting at diabolical things and ought to be thrown out of her party; it’s even worse if her words actually reflect a majority of her party members.
 
George Harris
Member # 2077
 - posted
News flash to the Canadians: We like you being another country. Interestingly, I know a couple Canadian refugees that have somehow ended up in Mississippi. (They are legal, and I think by now US citizens.) They have no interest whatsoever in moving back to Canada. About 35 years ago my boss was a Canadian. A few years before that he had been offered a short term assignment in Sydney and turned it down. The people I heard it from were having a good laugh at his expense. The company was meaning Australia. He was thinking Nova Scotia. In other words, he was not going back to Canada.
 



Contact Us | Home Page

Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.2




Copyright © 2007-2016 TrainWeb, Inc. Top of Page|TrainWeb|About Us|Advertise With Us|Contact Us