RailForum.com
TrainWeb.com

RAILforum Post New Topic  Post A Reply
my profile | directory login | register | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» RAILforum » Railfans » Western US » LA to Chicago 1955

   
Author Topic: LA to Chicago 1955
JoeRohmer
Junior Member
Member # 1097

Rate Member
Icon 5 posted      Profile for JoeRohmer     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I am doing research on a project and need to know which stations a train would pass through/stop at on a rail journey from Los Angeles to Chicago in 1955. Can anybody help me please?

------------------


Posts: 7 | From: London, England | Registered: Oct 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Super Chief
Junior Member
Member # 665

Rate Member
Icon 14 posted      Profile for Super Chief   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
The Santa Fe railway had many trains in 1955 that made the Los Angeles to Chicago trip. A few of the more famous were the Super Chief, El Capitan, Chief, and San Francisco Chief. The Stations that come to mind would be; Los Angeles, Pasadena Ca., San Bernardino Ca., Barstow Ca., Flagstaff Az., Gallup Nm., Alberquerque Nm., Trinidad Co., Kansas City Mo., Joliet Il., and Chicago. Of course different trains stopped at different stations. And there were many more stations that the Santa Fe served than what I've mentioned. Basically the present day Amtrak Southwest Chief follows the same route as many of the Santa Fe trains did in 1955. But a few years ago the Southwest Chief took another route to bypass Pasedena, and now goes through Fullerton. Also, in Illinois, the Southwest Chief took another route which no longer includes Joliet. A good source of information would be old Santa Fe time tables. Also, I think, the current Southwest Chief follows fairly closely to the original Super Chief schedule and the later combined Super Chief/El Capitan. Hope this can help

Posts: 18 | Registered: Mar 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
JoeRohmer
Junior Member
Member # 1097

Rate Member
Icon 7 posted      Profile for JoeRohmer     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Super Chief:
The Santa Fe railway had many trains in 1955 that made the Los Angeles to Chicago trip. A few of the more famous were the Super Chief, El Capitan, Chief, and San Francisco Chief. The Stations that come to mind would be; Los Angeles, Pasadena Ca., San Bernardino Ca., Barstow Ca., Flagstaff Az., Gallup Nm., Alberquerque Nm., Trinidad Co., Kansas City Mo., Joliet Il., and Chicago. Of course different trains stopped at different stations. And there were many more stations that the Santa Fe served than what I've mentioned. Basically the present day Amtrak Southwest Chief follows the same route as many of the Santa Fe trains did in 1955. But a few years ago the Southwest Chief took another route to bypass Pasedena, and now goes through Fullerton. Also, in Illinois, the Southwest Chief took another route which no longer includes Joliet. A good source of information would be old Santa Fe time tables. Also, I think, the current Southwest Chief follows fairly closely to the original Super Chief schedule and the later combined Super Chief/El Capitan. Hope this can help


Posts: 7 | From: London, England | Registered: Oct 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
JoeRohmer
Junior Member
Member # 1097

Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for JoeRohmer     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Thanks Super Chief for the information - it was very helpful. Do you know anything about the Union Pacific route between LA and Chicago?
Posts: 7 | From: London, England | Registered: Oct 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Super Chief
Junior Member
Member # 665

Rate Member
Icon 7 posted      Profile for Super Chief   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I'm not that familliar with the UP. But I know they had a train called the city of Los Angeles. This train however, didn't take UP track for the entire journey. The train would take Chicago and Northwestern track to get to Chicago as the UP ,I think, didn't have a direct route back in 1955. Now the C&NW is part of UP. The UP also used, and still does today, Santa Fe(BNSF now) track to get through the Cajon Pass in Southern California. As for station stops, I 'm not familiar with the route. In addition to the UP, I think Southern Pacific also had a Chicago/LA train but as with UP I think the train had to take a different railroads track or even change trains to get to Chicago.


Posts: 18 | Registered: Mar 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Indio Yard
Junior Member
Member # 1111

Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Indio Yard     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
RE: Pasadena Bypass

The tracks through Pasadena are no longer there. Part of the ATSF line through Pasadena ran down the middle of interstate 210. When I was a kid I used to love seeing the trains running on that track. My dad told me that one time when he was driving on the 210 that he was going about the same speed as the train and the engineer was waving him on like a race. (Not that the train would really break the speed limit).

That track also crossed over the Pasadena Freeway (110) in Highland Park on a long, high tressle. Sadly that tressel has also been dismantled.

I am unaware of why this line was removed. Having grown up in that area that line was my major source of train watching. (Freight and Amtrack).

Mike Fariss


Posts: 1 | From: Detroit, MI | Registered: Oct 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Motor8
Junior Member
Member # 1136

Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Motor8     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Hi! This reply is for Joe and Indio. Joe first.
Super Chief is right on about the Santa Fe routes and trains he mentioned, but here is another train that was considerably less popular but interesting none the less. The Southern Pacific ran The Golden State from LA to CHI to compete with the Chiefs and the City. It ran the "Sunset Route" from LA through Indio, Palm Springs, Blythe, Phoenix, Tucson, Deming, etc. I'm not exactly sure, but at either Las Cruces NM, or El Paso Texas, the train turned north through Alamagordo (White Sands), Carrizozo, (Roswell UFO crash) and Vaughn, NM to Tucumcari, NM. At Tucumcari, crews of the Rock Island operated the train over Rock Island tracks to Chicago. I don't know the route from Tucumcari to Chicago though. Here's an interesting bit of trivia for you. For many years, the Santa Fe's motto was "Santa Fe All The Way!" This was in reference to the fact that only on the Santa Fe could a person travel or ship from the west coast to Chicago using only one railroad's tracks. As SuperChief mentioned, The City trains of the UP were operated by the Chicago and North Western from some point around the Mississippi river, east to Chicago. This "inter-line" service also applied to the trains of the north on the Great Northern, Northern Pacific, and Milwaukee.

Posts: 3 | From: Bakersfield, CA | Registered: Oct 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Motor8
Junior Member
Member # 1136

Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Motor8     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Well, guess I need another post for Indio! Indio, take heart! The bridge over the 110 freeway, The Arroyo Seco viaduct, is still there! The Pasadena sub will live on as the Pasadena Blue Line light rail route. It will follow the same route as the Chiefs of old through Highland Park, South Pasadena and Pasadena for now, then the next phase will continue in the median of the Foothill and eastward. Go here to learn all about it. http://www.la-pasblueline.org/
Thanks for the memories btw. I grew up in Glendale and spent many summer days hanging around the Pasadena station waiting for the Southwest Limited and lamenting the fact that I was born too late to ever see a real live Santa Fe passenger train. I even boarded my first ever train there, the Southwest Limited in 1976 as a 12 yr old, bound for Chicago to see my dad.

Posts: 3 | From: Bakersfield, CA | Registered: Oct 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
PullmanCo
Full Member
Member # 1138

Icon 1 posted      Profile for PullmanCo     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I have several Union Pacific passenger timetables, and will try to post details on this in the next couple of days.

Short Version: Union Pacific calls their route the Overland Route. They used a different exit from LAUPT/Mission tower, running out through East Los Angeles and Riverside. Major stops included:

Las Vegas
Salt Lake City
Ogden
Cheyenne, WY
Omaha
Des Moines (I think)
Chicago

More details on trains tomorrow, but for starters, the top of the timetable was the "City of Los Angeles" and slid down to a transcontinental mail and express run.

John

------------------
The City of Saint Louis (UP, 1967) is still my standard for passenger operations


Posts: 1404 | Registered: Oct 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
PullmanCo
Full Member
Member # 1138

Icon 1 posted      Profile for PullmanCo     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
OH!!!

THE authoritative reference works on UP for detailed work in passenger operations are Dubin's Some Classic Trains (Kalmbach, 64) and Kratville's Union Pacific Streamliners (private, 1973 or so).

John


Posts: 1404 | Registered: Oct 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
JoeRohmer
Junior Member
Member # 1097

Rate Member
Icon 7 posted      Profile for JoeRohmer     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Thanks to everyone for the information - it's very helpful.

PullmanCo - could you tell me if the UP route you mention passed through or stopped at Grand island, Nebraska?

------------------


Posts: 7 | From: London, England | Registered: Oct 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
PullmanCo
Full Member
Member # 1138

Icon 1 posted      Profile for PullmanCo     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I've not forgotten you; I was an assistant show director for one of my other hobbies last weekend, and have been working 12 hour shifts since Monday morning.

Should have this for you tonight or tomorrow.

John


Posts: 1404 | Registered: Oct 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
PullmanCo
Full Member
Member # 1138

Icon 7 posted      Profile for PullmanCo     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
HERE WE GO!

Source data is Kratville, Union Pacific Streamliners, pp. 504-507

I am looking at condensed public timetables dated January and September 1947.

CAVEAT: On October 1, 1955, the Union Pacific terminated its contracts with the C&NW and began its contracts with the Chicago Milwaukee St Paul and Pacific (Milwaukee Road). That may influence you.

Route: LA Leg. This is the traditional Los Angeles and Salt Lake RR, wholly owned by UP.

Los Angeles
East Lost Angeles
Riverside
San Bernadino CA
Las Vegas NV
Caliente (PT-MT switch)
Lund
Milford UT
Salt Lake City
Ogden (LINKUP with SP here!) UT

Route SF Leg (via SP)
SF (ferry to Oakland)
Oakland
Berkeley
Sacramento
(Donner Pass)
Truckee
Reno
Ogden, UT

Common UP leg:
Ogden
Evanston WY
Rock Springs
Rawlins
Laramie
Cheyenne WY
Sidney NE
North Platte (MT-CT switch)
Kearney
Grand Island
Fremont
Omaha
Council Bluffs ... Consult a C&NW timetable
for details to Chicago
Cedar Rapids
Clinton
Chicago

Train laydown in 1947, at Omaha was:

City of Los Angeles, EB and WB
City of San Francisco, EB and WB
Los Angeles Limited, EB and WB
San Francisco Overland, EB and WB
Pacific EB and WB (Chi-SF, picked up StL-LA through cars at and was named Pacific/Pony Express Cheyenne - Ogden)
San Francisco Challenger, EB and WB
Mail/Express - Uthahn, EB/WB (Chi-LA)

I hope all this was the information you needed.

John
So you have 7 "front of the timetable" First Class (passenger) movements each day in each direction.

------------------
The City of Saint Louis (UP, 1967) is still my standard for passenger operations


Posts: 1404 | Registered: Oct 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
20thCenturyLimited
Full Member
Member # 1108

Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for 20thCenturyLimited     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Indio Yard:
RE: Pasadena Bypass

The tracks through Pasadena are no longer there. Part of the ATSF line through Pasadena ran down the middle of interstate 210. When I was a kid I used to love seeing the trains running on that track. My dad told me that one time when he was driving on the 210 that he was going about the same speed as the train and the engineer was waving him on like a race. (Not that the train would really break the speed limit).

That track also crossed over the Pasadena Freeway (110) in Highland Park on a long, high tressle. Sadly that tressel has also been dismantled.

I am unaware of why this line was removed. Having grown up in that area that line was my major source of train watching. (Freight and Amtrack).

Mike Fariss


The right of way down the 210 has not been removed. In fact, I'm not sure the tracks have been removed either. The Southwest Chief was rerouted through Fullerton becuase the route down the median of the 210 through Pasadena to Los Angeles is now being readied for the start of the Pasadena to L.A. Blue Line commuter light rail service. Pasadena and others along the corridor had a choice of either Metrolink Commuter trains or waiting for the light rail, and they chose the latter.

[This message has been edited by 20thCenturyLimited (edited 11-19-2001).]


Posts: 134 | From: New York, New York USA | Registered: Oct 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
JoeRohmer
Junior Member
Member # 1097

Rate Member
Icon 7 posted      Profile for JoeRohmer     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Thanks for the info PullmanCo. I did post a thank you for the UP info before but it didn't take for some reason.
Posts: 7 | From: London, England | Registered: Oct 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
JoeRohmer
Junior Member
Member # 1097

Rate Member
Icon 7 posted      Profile for JoeRohmer     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Thanks for the info PullmanCo. I did post a thank you for the UP info before but it didn't take for some reason.
Posts: 7 | From: London, England | Registered: Oct 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
JoeRohmer
Junior Member
Member # 1097

Rate Member
Icon 7 posted      Profile for JoeRohmer     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Thanks for the UP info PullmanCo. The info I now have - with Santa Fe and the rest - is perfect for what I want.
Posts: 7 | From: London, England | Registered: Oct 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
PullmanCo
Full Member
Member # 1138

Icon 1 posted      Profile for PullmanCo     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
A little more detail on the Nevada leg of the SP...
Reno
Fernley
Fallon
Lovelock
Winnemucca
Battle Mountain
Elko
Wells

John


Posts: 1404 | Registered: Oct 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
   

Quick Reply
Message:

HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.

Instant Graemlins
   


Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


Contact Us | Home Page

Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.2




Copyright © 2007-2016 TrainWeb, Inc. Top of Page|TrainWeb|About Us|Advertise With Us|Contact Us