RailForum.com
TrainWeb.com

RAILforum Post A Reply
my profile | directory login | register | search | faq | forum home

» RAILforum » Railfans » Western US » High Hood Versus Low Hood Locomotives » Post A Reply

Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon: Icon 1     Icon 2     Icon 3     Icon 4     Icon 5     Icon 6     Icon 7    
Icon 8     Icon 9     Icon 10     Icon 11     Icon 12     Icon 13     Icon 14    
Message:

HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.

 

Instant Graemlins Instant UBB Code™
Smile   Frown   Embarrassed   Big Grin   Wink   Razz  
Cool   Roll Eyes   Mad   Eek!   Confused    
Insert URL Hyperlink - UBB Code™   Insert Email Address - UBB Code™
Bold - UBB Code™   Italics - UBB Code™
Quote - UBB Code™   Code Tag - UBB Code™
List Start - UBB Code™   List Item - UBB Code™
List End - UBB Code™   Image - UBB Code™

What is UBB Code™?
Options


Disable Graemlins in this post.


 


T O P I C     R E V I E W
Konstantin
Member # 18
 - posted
Several of the freight and road-switcher locomotives of the 1950s-1960s were offered in low hood and high hood models. Almost all, possibly all, locomotives built today are low hood.

It seems to me, that if railroads had their choice, they would choose low hoods because the visibility is so much better. What was better about the high hoods? Why did some railroads buy the high hood versions instead of the low hood versions?

Thank you

------------------
Elias Valley Railroad (N-scale)
www.geocities.com/evrr

 

Kent Loudon
Member # 902
 - posted
High hoods on road switchers were traditionally the location of steam heat generators for passenger service. I believe the manufacturers initially found it simpler to build all units in this configuration.
 
DC2001
Member # 542
 - posted
Southern Railway bought high-hood locomotives (GP-50's) into the early 1980's. The stated purpose was safety - the high short hood offered greater crew protection in the event of a collision. I think I am correct in stating that Southern's policy was that any short-hood engines leading trains on their system (Santa Fe, UP, etc) had to be run long-hood forward for crew safety. When Southern acquired the original Norfolk Southern railway (not todays NS), they rebuilt its short-hood engines with high-hoods.

There are also disadvantages to this type operation. Visibility is reduced from the cab and engines running long-hood forward puts the fuel tank in front of the cab.
 

PullmanCo
Member # 1138
 - posted
The GP-7, SD-7, Fairbanks-Morse and Baldwin's initial road-switcher offerings were only in high hood. ALCO's ... I'll defer to a specialist.

I want to say the GP-20 was the first offering in low hood...

John
 

Run 8
Member # 1176
 - posted
For the most part, when the high hood power was being built, railroads were still required to run firemen on the locomotives, so visiblity wasn't really an issue. Also, the visibility advantage with short nose units is mainly close up, at a disance the visibility is pretty good on a high hood unit too. In addition to the steam generators in the high noses, they are also much more convienient of a storage locker and restroom facility for the crew on a high hood.


 




Contact Us | Home Page

Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.2




Copyright © 2007-2016 TrainWeb, Inc. Top of Page|TrainWeb|About Us|Advertise With Us|Contact Us