RailForum.com
TrainWeb.com

RAILforum Post A Reply
my profile | directory login | register | search | faq | forum home

» RAILforum » Railfans » Western US » Double Tracking Part of the Sunset Route? » Post A Reply

Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon: Icon 1     Icon 2     Icon 3     Icon 4     Icon 5     Icon 6     Icon 7    
Icon 8     Icon 9     Icon 10     Icon 11     Icon 12     Icon 13     Icon 14    
Message:

HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.

 

Instant Graemlins Instant UBB Code™
Smile   Frown   Embarrassed   Big Grin   Wink   Razz  
Cool   Roll Eyes   Mad   Eek!   Confused    
Insert URL Hyperlink - UBB Code™   Insert Email Address - UBB Code™
Bold - UBB Code™   Italics - UBB Code™
Quote - UBB Code™   Code Tag - UBB Code™
List Start - UBB Code™   List Item - UBB Code™
List End - UBB Code™   Image - UBB Code™

What is UBB Code™?
Options


Disable Graemlins in this post.


 


T O P I C     R E V I E W
Konstantin
Member # 18
 - posted
I recently drove between Yuma and Gila Bend Arizona along Union Pacific's Sunset Route. Most of it is single track, but there was construction along it for several miles. It looks like they may be double tracking it, or maybe just adding some very long sidings.

Does anybody know what is happening there and why they are doing it?

Also, it looks like the new track has concrete ties, and is about 6" to 1' lower in elevation than the existing track. Why would they build it at a different elevation?

------------------
Elias Valley Railroad (N-scale)
www.geocities.com/evrr

 

MPALMER
Member # 125
 - posted
Konstantin,

Can't say for sure but they are probably some of each (extending double track and extending sidings).
They have been upgrading the Sunset route over time...double tracking went in in the Benson area around '95.
Don't know why there would be a (minor) elevation difference between the two tracks, though.

MP
 

Andybuzz2u
Member # 2008
 - posted
I talked to my brother who is a former SP conductor out of El Paso, tx and he said that UP put money aside to double the entire sunset route from Houston, tx west and that this is going to be done over the next five to six years...he said the reason was the increased rail traffic from mexico and that the line was beginning to become congested with trains and that UP did not want another 97 slow down on its hands. And that UP is running directional traffic which means that the sunset line is mostly west bound traffic with the exception of amtrak and assighned locals and road switchers and the former MP line is east traffic towards Houston, and other ports...And im guessing in the diffrence in track height is for draniage..with dual main lines at the same height water tends to pool up between the rails instead of running off know there is not much rain out there but when it comes it comes..or they dont want to spend the time and money to match the hight of the orignal main...hope this helps any...Andy.
 
Konstantin
Member # 18
 - posted
Thank you for the information. It's good to hear that the Sunset Route is being expanded.

------------------
Elias Valley Railroad (N-scale)
www.geocities.com/evrr

 

CP-home
Member # 1924
 - posted
Does anyone know if UP is going to double track the Golden State Route also???
 
coach34135
Member # 1979
 - posted
I barely remember construction along there.
I wonder if the double track would let the SL run a little more on time....(yeah right wishful thinking)
 
theriograndedude
Member # 1793
 - posted
Well last year they were doubletracking the track north of Willcox, my home town for about 10 miles and some trackage south of the Dry Lake.
 



Contact Us | Home Page

Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.2




Copyright © 2007-2016 TrainWeb, Inc. Top of Page|TrainWeb|About Us|Advertise With Us|Contact Us